I'm investigating the benefits or pitfalls of including lay or plain-language summaries with clinical studies. There are a lot of arguments for it (see research piece: Preprint PLS and patient engagement
Would you consider this good, bad, necessary ....? What should a lay summary include as a minimum to ensure the paper is correctly represented? Is a different skill set required to write a lay summary - should the author write it or should it be written by an objective reviewer?