Here’s a guide to writing a review for the article "How to Write Applied Papers in Economics", structured with clarity and professionalism;

1. Title of the Review

"Critical Review of 'How to Write Applied Papers in Economics'"

2. Introduction

• Begin with a brief overview of the article, including the title, author(s), and publication year.
• State the purpose of the article: to provide practical guidance for writing high-quality applied papers in economics.
• Mention the relevance of the article to economic researchers, particularly for those aiming to translate complex research into actionable insights.

Example: The article "How to Write Applied Papers in Economics" by [Author(s)] offers a comprehensive guide for researchers aiming to bridge theory and practice in applied economic research. This review critically examines its key themes, strengths, and potential areas for improvement.

3. Summary of the Article

Provide a concise summary of the key points discussed in the article:

• Purpose of Applied Papers: Highlight the need for clarity, practicality, and relevance in applied economics research.
• Structure and Organization: Explain the suggested structure for applied papers, including:A clear and concise introduction with a research question and motivation. Literature review focusing on how the paper contributes to existing research. Methodology section detailing data sources, econometric models, and assumptions. Results section emphasizing interpretation and policy implications. Conclusion summarizing key findings and suggesting avenues for future research.
• Writing Style: Discuss the emphasis on simplicity, precision, and avoiding excessive jargon.
• Policy Relevance: Stress the importance of linking results to real-world problems and policy debates.

4. Critical Analysis

Evaluate the article based on its strengths and weaknesses:

Strengths:

• Clarity: The article provides step-by-step guidance for structuring applied papers.
• Practical Examples: Use of examples to illustrate best practices.
• Focus on Policy: Emphasizes the importance of translating findings into actionable insights.

Weaknesses:

• Limited Coverage of Pitfalls: While the article discusses best practices, it could delve deeper into common mistakes made by authors in applied economics.
• Lack of Contextual Diversity: The examples provided may lean heavily on developed economies, with limited discussion of writing applied papers in developing country contexts.
• Interdisciplinary Insights: The article could benefit from integrating insights from other disciplines, such as sociology or political science, when addressing applied economic problems.

5. Relevance and Contribution

Discuss how the article contributes to the field of applied economics and its practical utility for researchers:

• It equips new researchers with the tools to write impactful papers that address real-world challenges.
• It helps experienced economists refine their writing to enhance clarity and policy relevance.
• It bridges the gap between theoretical research and practical policy-making.

6. Recommendations

Provide suggestions for improving the article or related work in the field:

• Include a section on common pitfalls and how to avoid them (e.g., overfitting models, misinterpreting causal relationships).
• Provide more diverse examples from different regions or sectors.
• Suggest additional readings or resources for researchers seeking further guidance.

7. Conclusion

Summarize your evaluation and restate the significance of the article:

• Reiterate the article’s value as a guide for writing applied economics papers.
• Highlight its practical relevance, while noting areas for improvement to make it more comprehensive.

Example: The article serves as an excellent starting point for economists looking to translate theory into impactful research. While there are opportunities to broaden its scope and provide more nuanced insights, it remains a valuable resource for improving the quality of applied economics research.

8. References

Cite the article and any additional sources used in your review (e.g., guidelines for economic writing or related methodological papers). Use a consistent citation style such as APA or Chicago.