If we are in unison inre to the aforementioned ,then the cosmic speed is one-third the speed of light for particles of masses greater than 1kg. Please verify my publications in regard to the same.
Dear Pardeep,
Please, could you summarize the idea behind so surprising result? Are you suggesting that the mass of 1kg has a critical value with respect to the kinetic energy of the cosmic bodies?
Dear Daniel, The question should be debated by the researcher,one who concedes or agree with the first part of the question.From your reply,one cannot presume you are a consensualist.You mostly fit in the contrarian mould.Secondly, fluid intelligence of the type needed in Data Sufficiency questions in algebra section inequalities in GMAT exam is a prerequisite.
Regards
P.K.
Is this question only for consensualists? Do you have a special science?
For the question assumes the consensualist ought to generally agree with the questioner.
"For the question assumes the consensualist ought to generally agree with the questioner."
Can we be clear: you are not actually asking a question, you are asking for people to agree with you. This is antithetical to the scientific method where models are rigorously tested both by argument and by experiment. If your theory has merit it ought to stand up to a few basic questions. If it can't, it can't ever be anything more than an opinion. If you don't want people to debate your theory with you, you are on the wrong site. Just to be clear.
Dear Erik,
The relativistic gamma is the reciprocal of a squareroot of a real number and a constant.Hence, it could acquire two values positive and negative. Positive value is OK . To eliminate the negative value, modulus or absolute value has to be taken of the relativistic gamma.But I ascribed those who favoured the same as consensualists,consider that as mere tokenism. As a mathematician,I hope you have no problem in accepting the same.Now check my publications and give your comments.
Regards
P.K.
Dear Pradeep,
The answer that you gave me, assuming that there are people who could understand the relativity depending of a current of thought, seems to be a sect. This is not correct for a scientist, who has to answer even trying to be independent of his own opinion, as Erik quite well said. Perhaps this could be accepted for a mathematician but never by a physicist who tries to understand the reality.
Consensualist means to easily consent and willingly participate.Now, a trivial aspect that is to preclude negative value of a square root,we are including a modulus in the relativistic gamma.Time cannot be negative to be meaningful.Scientists who want to sabotage any meaningful consensus discussion regarding the relativity subject is behind the scenes
" Science is not about building a body of known 'facts". It is a method for asking awkward questions and subjecting them to a reality-check,thus avoiding the human tendency to believe whatever makes us feel good." Terry Pratchett
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematics