Dear colleagues,
I would like to share with you the list of predatory publishers. Is this list applies to the entire scientific community? And the criteria of selection are unanimously adopted or not?
https://scholarlyoa.com/2015/01/02/bealls-list-of-predatory-publishers-2015/
https://scholarlyoa.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/criteria-2015.pdf
Thank you in advance for all your contributions
Best regards,
A. DEGAICHIA
I am not sure on the coverage of the list for scientific community. But, the criteria for choosing a right journal / publishing agent is well analysed by Prof Beall and found useful for further. Thank you for sharing.
Dear Dietrich Rordorf,
Thank you for sharing. Your blogs contain relevant informations about the indicators of a reputable open access journal.
A. DEGAICHIA
Dear Nirmala S.V.S.G,
Thank you for the document of Mr. Jeffrey Beall, that I myself shared in my question :) But I wonder if the entire scientific community (research centers, universities, ...) agreed on these criteria.
Regards,
Amor DEGAICHIA
Dear Amor
Every day we receive a number of emails from Journal have no history invited us to publish a paper, in spite we hope to encourage the new Journals to appear and contribute in publishing the scientific research results which lead to scientific development . But the appearance of not reviewed paper from this Journal and publish wrong data may lead to harmful confusion to the wide range of researchers, so we must be careful when we chose Journal to publish or to take reference. I hope to good new Journals to have shining future and be a stone in the scientific building .
Predatory publishers aimed to quick economic benefits without care for the quality of articles and they ask high charges for publishing.
In another hand, maybe we read a random list of Journals described as predatory within a process of competition between old and new publishers.
Good Luck
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publisher