In its judgment on 27 February 2014 the Court of Justice ruled that where a Member State chooses to provide a financial allowance instead of asylum accommodation, the allowance must, inter alia, be sufficient to ensure a dignified standard of living and enable the asylum applicants to obtain housing, if necessary, on the private rental market. Are there any legal or practical consequences of this judgment in your country?
In Argentina I have understood that all asylum while possessing a certain sum of money to "survive" really misses him at all, not even for a dignified life and decent housing.
I think that politicians go so slowly... that mybe in two years, but I think that actually there are no consequences of the C-79/13 Saciri judgment in Spain. But it is very interesting, I will see!
Could "Saciri" be still invoked by the asylum applicants in Europe...?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publications