As we known, to solve a multi-objective optimization problem, there are two choices: (1) Aggregating the objectives into a single objective by weighting and summing them up, and then the obtained single objective problem is solved by GA, PSO, etc. (2) Developing the multi-objective EAs to generate a Pareto solutions.

Now, I have two objectives with different scales and different meanings.

And my question is: Does it meaningful if I use choice(1)? Are there any conditions that the objectives must meet when using (1)? Does it meaningful by comparing (1) with (2) experimentally?

I ask you all for valuable comments. [References] are appreciated.

Thank you in advance.

More Zhongyi Hu's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions