If “Yes”, why we have totally different operations on them? If “No”, what are the differences and how to treat them differently and why?
Lacking systematic cognition to “infinitesimal” by the confusion of “potential infinite” and “actual infinite” in the foundation of present classical infinite related philosophy and mathematics, no one in the world now can answer above question scientifically and this is the very reason for many “suspended infinite related paradox families” in present classical infinite related mathematics.
It is very easy to talk about what infinities and infinitesimals are theoretically within the present classical “potential infinite--actual infinite” related science and mathematics (with the standard or non-standard or some future new “former languages”), but it is impossible to treat them self-justificationaly in some practical situations as what has been talking about.
Five of my published papers have been up loaded onto RG to answer such questions:
1，On the Quantitative Cognitions to “Infinite Things” (I)
2，On the Quantitative Cognitions to “Infinite Things” (II)
3，On the Quantitative Cognitions to “Infinite Things” (III)
4 On the Quantitative Cognitions to “Infinite Things” (IV)
5 On the Quantitative Cognitions to “Infinite Things” (V)
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematics