A striking resemblance of the quantum field of the magnet shown by the ferrolens fig.1 [1] with Modons [2] fig.2 (i.e. counter rotating joined side by side vortexes or whirlpools). A strong indication of the joined counter spin double vortex nature of dipole magnetism and that field of dipole magnet consists of two distinct (monopole) joined vortex fields (poles of magnet).
Fig.1 Quantum field of magnet as shown with the ferrolens. A cylindrical magnet on top of the ferrolens. Inner theta θ pattern shown resembles modon geometrical pattern shown in fig2. [1]
Fig.2 Modons. Two distinct counter rotating vortices whirlpools, joined together at the middle. Striking resamblance with quantum field of magnet as shown in fig.1 previously [2].
Video Demonstration of Modons: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnbJEg9r1o8
Fig.3 ModonsVs Quantum field of magnet illustration as shown with the quantum magne optic device ferrolens. Modons can transfer matter as magnetism does. The only fundamental difference in the geometry of Modons and quantum dipole magnetic field vortices is that Modons are joined side by side on the same plane whereas dipole magnetic vortices are joined through a common axis of rotation on their center as shown above.
Fig.4 A modon on a pool. Some food coloring was used to make visible the vortices (poles) joint (Bloch domain wall). Possible correlation of a modon with a dipole magnet is also shown.
Emmanouil Markoulakis
Technological Educational Institute of Crete
p.s. I'm always open to collaborations and co authoring proposals.
References
[1] Markoulakis, Emmanouil; Konstantaras, Antonios; Antonidakis, Emmanuel (2018). "The quantum field of a magnet shown by a nanomagnetic ferrolens". Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 466: 252–259. arXiv:1807.08751 📷. doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.07.012. ISSN 0304-8853.
Article The Quantum Field Of A Magnet Shown By A Nanomagnetic Ferrolens
[2]Article Rapid Water Transport by Long-Lasting Modon Eddy Pairs in th...
Dear Emmanouil,
Are you aware of the recent research into creating analogs of Dirac magnetic monopoles in Bose-Einstein condensates? The theory proposal Article Creation of Dirac Monopoles in Spinor Bose-Einstein Condensates
and the subsequent experimental realization https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12954 are perhaps the most essential of these. In this superfluid system, the analog of the Dirac string, which is a mathematical construct dependent on the chosen gauge, is actually a physical vortex half-line in the superfluid velocity field (the velocity field acts here as the analog of the vector potential). This research may bear relevance to this discussion as well.Interestingly enough, we are currently working on a theory paper where we propose modifying this method to create Dirac monopole-antimonopole pairs (i.e., dipoles) in the BEC synthetic magnetic field. In this case, the two opposite monopoles can be joined by a vortex line segment. I shall carefully look into your article to examine the connection more closely.
Cheers,
Pekko
Dear Professor Pekko Kuopanportti,
Thank you for your confirmation.
I am aware of your papers.
Our proposal for the Quantum Field of the Magnet,
Article The Quantum Field Of A Magnet Shown By A Nanomagnetic Ferrolens
arxiv: https://tinyurl.com/yb9bu7jk
suggests the actual flux (not vector potential) field geometry of a magnet to be somehow masked when macroscopic ferromagnetic field imaging sensors are used giving a false interference macroscopic pattern of the actual magnetic field. Modern quantum superparamagnetic optic sensors like the ferrolens can reveal the actual flux o magnetic dipoles which is deviating from the classical monotone spherical macroscopic flux imprint we had all these years and revealing the joint counter vortex (poles) torus geometry. These two counter torus-vorteces are essentially monopolar fields (i.e. a vortex essentially has one singularity pole on its center) joined back to back at the domain wall of the dipole magnet in the middle.
Nothing else in classical EM theory changes and gyromagnetic ratio is preserved in this new proposed field geometry since essentially the spherical nature of magnetic fields remains although now consisting of two joined hemispheres.
However there are minor discoveries which potentially can emerge by this new proposed field geometry like magnetic monopoles, dark matter, dark energy etc... nothing special... :)
Kind Regards,
Emmanouil Markoulakis
Tehnological Educational Institute of Crete
p.s. You may also like to have a look in this thread here,
https://tinyurl.com/yd6kpxwb
Dear Pekko,
quote:
" Interestingly enough, we are currently working on a theory paper where we propose modifying this method to create Dirac monopole-antimonopole pairs (i.e., dipoles) in the BEC synthetic magnetic field. In this case, the two opposite monopoles can be joined by a vortex line segment. I shall carefully look into your article to examine the connection more closely. "
A BEC modon should do the trick.
Clad my question could potentially help your research.
Emmanouil
Some analogies
Concerning the vortex nature of magnetism in correlation with modons on Newtonian fluids as observed in the Physics girl youtube video presented in question thread we can conjugate some interesting analogies with EM.
The counter vortices (magnetic poles) where created on the pool due the introduction of a moving mass disturbing the gravitational field equilibrium thus the inertia of the system by introducing a differential pressure (electric potential or instability) on the the pool mass (inert magnetic monopole charge aka dark energy).
The apexes of the two counter hyperbola vortices or else singularities (oppoiste magnetic monopole particles) in the pool formed, are joint together at the middle of the created tube (Bloch domain wall) shown joining together the two vortices and at the same time not allowing them to merge. This monopoles are located at the middle of the tube and are now a dipole, the surface vortices are merely a projection of the dipole formed in the middle of the tube (domain wall of magnet)(the same exactly as we observe on the quantum field of a dipole magnet shown with the qunatum ferrolens). The pattern of modons shown in the question thread above shows flow velocity thus in direct analogy with flux in magnetic fields. Thus, since the only natural observed energy quanta in a static magnetic field is its flux we must come to the conclusion that the modon pattern shown for a dipole magnetic field on a ferrolens is actually magnetic flux and not magnetic vector potential diagram which a mathematical construct and can therefore not naturally observed. Surely, the ferrolens is a physical object which obeys natural laws is not a computer simulation and can not produce naturally a equipotential mathematical diagram. This newly unmasked flux geometrical pattern of a dipole magnet we observe with the ferrolens we call Quantum Field of Magnet.
Going one step further in the pool experiment EM analogy, the moving mass introduced (linear moving vertical plate in water) signifies an electric charge imbalance of ordinary matter that interferes with the inert dark energy monopole charge field which is omnipresent in our universe. This interaction effect which manifests whenever and wherever an electric charge disturbance is taking place we call Electromagnetism (EM).
Therefore, the theoretical assumption all these years that dark matter and dark energy is not interacting electromagnetically with ordinary matter is false, I submit, since the product of their interaction IS ELECTROMAGNETISM!
In other words, I believe, EM is an interaction effect of ordinary matter and energy with dark matter and dark energy.
This interaction effect is taking place all the time and everywhere in our universe from the quantum scale to the galactic macroscale.
Emmanouil Markoulakis
TEI of Crete
"Therefore, the theoretical assumption all these years that dark matter and dark energy is not interacting electromagnetically with ordinary matter is false, I submit, since the product of their interaction IS ELECTROMAGNETISM!
In other words, I believe, EM is an interaction effect of ordinary matter and energy with dark matter and dark energy.
This interaction effect is taking place all the time and everywhere in our universe from the quantum scale to the galactic macroscale."
I agree!
I see EM as a form of surface tension? This permeates everywhere in many different ways? The chances are that there was not a big bang but a 'kiss'!! I don't buy into the singularities.
Have a read through the last 7-8 posts on the Vision-Space project if you have the time Emmanouil.
I still struggle with the specifics of your study area but that's not surprising really!
Figure. Same polarity polar fields collide resulting to repulsion. A third pole is formed in the midpoint as shown in the ferrolens.
Just for fun!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjJy7GBTkAo
Notice here the initial two vortices in the above video are not a modon since they area not counter spinning. Fluid dynamics says that these two opposite same spin vortices should repel each other but due to general circular movement of the water in the area are forced to merge.
Notice also how a third same spin midpoint vortex is formed drawing the other two vortexes inside. Curiously enough the same pattern we see on the ferrolens (third black hole in the middle see figure) whenever we approach the repulsing same poles of two magnets together and trying to force them to stick together!
Emmanouil
John,
There is actually a great new unification study and research on the interaction of ordinary matter and energy (known) with dark matter and energy (unknow) expalining all the forces and phenomena we experience in the universe:
Article Magnetic Charge Theory—The Unification of Gravity with Elect...
Emmanouil
John,
A ferrolens is a membrane essentially trying to emulate the human eye. It responds not the the visible EMR spectrum but to the magnetic radiation translating it to visible information and light.
Think of it like magnetic vision and a magnetic eye.
Direct observation is the number one scientific experimental method and best weapon we can have to decipher nature I submit. All other methods have a higher probability to misinterpret information.
Emmanouil
Direct 'recording' you mean?
....but EMR, the eye and brain are prior-to any instrumentation we develop on the basis of what we currently understand. That is 'observation' our instrumentation does not observe it records. So it HAS to be team work! Dismiss the subjective and you are cut off from experiential reality and that will end in tears.
Direct observation technological and scientific methods make possible to perceive and record in real time physical phenomena without any numerical processing involved or other transformations.
Usually it refers to apparatus making visible or audible nature.
A good example is the microscope.
Also, although spectroscopy is a useful method for deciding the possibility if a far away planet has liquid water the final confirmation would come if we could remotely see the planet surface close up from Earth.
Dear All,
The omnipresent aether medium is coming back in science today with new proof of concept experiments and and as an alternative theory to the Copenhagen interpretation fallacy: The theory now contradicting the establishment and gaining ground over time is an old theory namely the the pilot wave theory:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIyTZDHuarQ (pilot wave theory)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZPVp0NGEYY (Nassim Haramein explaining)
http://dualwalkers.com/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilot_wave_theory. (biased view) Elementary particles and quanta of energy are all manifestations of these same omnipresent medium (aerher), in the form of vibrations, condensations, waves, and in general distortions of this aether universal dark (i.e. we can not detect it yet but only can see the effects of interaction with it like EM SNF WNF and Gravity).
Emmanouil Markoulakis
TEI of Crete
On the true form of magnetic fields shown by the ferrolens and their correlation with Maxwell EM Theory and Faraday's experimental observations
https://www.researchgate.net/project/The-quantum-field-of-a-magnet/update/5b9e33a23843b006753992c2
Emmanouil
Magnetic field inside a d.c. current coil shown by the ferrocell
https://www.researchgate.net/project/The-quantum-field-of-a-magnet/update/5babb275cfe4a76455f63954