In the first great work on bone histology, tuna (Thunnus and Auxis) were grouped by Kölliker (1859, Proc. Roy. Soc. London) amongst fishes with cellular bone (also thus cited by Parenti 1986, in her Zool. J. Linn. Soc. paper).

This is atypical for higher teleosts, which have acellular bone. In the same publication, Kölliker mentions that the osteocytes are found in the larger scales of Thunnus. In his series of acellular bone of fishes, Moss (1961, Acta Anat.) groups Thunnus with fishes that have acellular bone.

Does anyone know how it really is? Do tuna have cellular bones or not? Do only tuna "corselet" scales consist of cellular, dermal bone (which is strange in itself)?

In which references can I find answers to these questions?

Similar questions and discussions