No encuentro razón para prolongar la longevidad en un mundo finito en donde toda vida tiene su curso. Entiendo, no obstante, que todo aquello que suponga una mejora en la salud de cada individuo ha de ser un objetivo prioritario. Aquí incluyo también a los animales.

Your Edward J Tehovnik derived equation supports the idea that, following the extinction event 64 million years ago, mammals and birds evolved with growth and longevity patterns that favor larger sizes for longer lifespans. This evolutionary trajectory would have helped these groups establish themselves in the new ecological landscape, filling the void left by the dinosaurs and contributing to the rich biodiversity observed today; the core idea remains that larger mammals tend to have longer lifespans.

You've highlighted a compelling and nuanced perspective on longevity research and the influence of evolutionary principles. The core idea is that genetic interventions aimed at extending lifespan must navigate the complex balance between potential benefits and unforeseen health risks—morbidity being a significant concern.

If the relationship between body weight and longevity is indeed a fundamental law emerging from evolutionary processes across diverse species, then it suggests that biological constraints and trade-offs are deeply ingrained in the fabric of life. In such a scenario, natural selection and evolutionary pressures might impose limits on how far longevity can be extended through genetic modification alone.

Your point that evolution could "beat out" attempts by individuals or billionaires to artificially extend lifespan underscores the idea that biological systems are inherently resilient and governed by principles that may resist or constrain radical alterations. This perspective emphasizes the importance of understanding evolutionary biology and genetic trade-offs before pursuing aggressive longevity interventions.

Ultimately, it suggests a cautious approach: advancements in genetics and biotechnology should be informed by evolutionary theory to better predict potential outcomes and avoid unintended consequences. It also highlights the intriguing possibility that natural evolutionary processes may set hard boundaries on lifespan extension, regardless of technological or financial resources

________________

You Edward J Tehovnik also bring up an insightful point about the transformative impact of technological advancements, particularly in semiconductor engineering and artificial intelligence, on the landscape of wealth creation and societal roles. The miniaturization of computer chips—thanks to advances like Moore's Law—and sophisticated programming have indeed propelled innovations such as ChatGPT and DeepSeek, which are capable of performing complex cognitive tasks.

These developments hold the potential to augment or even automate activities traditionally performed by humans, including education, research, and intellectual leadership. As AI systems become increasingly capable, they could reshape the way knowledge is disseminated and how future generations are trained, potentially reducing costs and increasing accessibility.

However, this technological evolution also raises important questions about the future of employment, education, and societal structures. While AI can serve as a powerful tool to support intellectual endeavors, the human element—such as mentorship, ethical judgment, and creative insight—remains vital. Ensuring that these technologies complement rather than fully replace human expertise will be key to harnessing their benefits responsibly.

In essence, the ongoing integration of optimized engineering and advanced programming is likely to continue redefining economic and educational paradigms, emphasizing the importance of thoughtful implementation and policy to maximize societal benefit.

Best, stephen

The Comenius Project

Non-Profit Corporation

Scientific Research into Learning Processes

(AI, didactics, mathetics, mental health)