Dear Ms. Popescu,

We have started a "Ramanujan Hardy Mallick Hamburger Mallick School of Mathematical Sciences Thinking" (RHMHMSMST) here on www.researchgate.net/profile/Soumitra_Mallick by Mallick, Hamburger, Mallick (2016, 2017) which has developed a number of Mathematical-Statistical Technologies like (1) Vector Diffeotopy, (2) Jump Quantum Conductance, (3) Artificial Genetic Gravitational National Neural Networks (AGGNNNetworks), (4) "sustainable" E-Commerce AGGNN Networks, (5) "sustainable" E-Stock Exchange AGGNNNetworks, (6) "sustainable" E-Library Networks (Mallick, Krichel & Novarese (2010)). Besides, of course developing the Fundamental Theorem of Differential String Theory. The papers and references can be found on our webpage as above. Hence, for this school of thinking establishment which we would like to see being extended which is being used by us as well as some other collaborators can be meaningfully and gainfully bidded for the project proposal you have made , I as the corresponding collaborator, would like to explore. There would be we believe some Creative Commons licensing arising from such collaborative effort, although we have no idea at this stage what that would be and should serve our individual purposes coherently like International Prizes.

Soumitra K. Mallick

for Soumitra K. Mallick, Nick Hamburger, Sandipan Mallick

my dear Anamaria Popescu , you be first clear what is energy and what is force.....

proof:::::

Dark Energy= Time

Time= main force......

from this proof it is very clear that you are ruled by your emotional imaginative theories rather than actual physics logic!

because energy cannot be a force and energy cannot be a time.....!

Anamaria,

You may be interested in my website. It describes a framework for a T.O.E. that proposes the entire universe is comprised of foamy (a)ether, and all particles and forces are distortions or activities of that ether.

http://pcmhahn.wixsite.com/foamyether

Dear Peter,

Could you please use your Foamy (A)ether theory and answer next question:

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_somebody_solve_the_next_problem_by_using_only_general_relativity

Because nobody from mainstream part answered it.

Thank you

Dear Anamaria,

I don't agree on setting time equal to a hypothesized entity like 'dark energy'.

The name is not really relevant. It was the closest concept similarity I found.

It might be even the Peter's "foamy ether", the point is that it diminishes by the number of morphic fields passed and it penetrates through matter. You can call it also DECAY FORCE.

Dear Ms. Popescu,

I think you have a point in that you are saying that dark energy can be the same as time under some alternative model of the universe, but you have to say something in terms of relativity, it can't be something so direct.

Soumitra K. Mallick