Dear All,
Recently, I found the following links that refute the origin or inventorships of ELM (Extreme Learning Machine) and Deep Learning.
http://elmorigin.wix.com/originofelm
http://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/deep-learning-conspiracy.html
I wonder if there are any open responds to these refutations from LeCun, Bengio and Hinton groups and also from Guang Bin Huang, that I have not read? This is important since this will guide us on how to best cite the previous works on ELM dan Deep Learning on our future publications.
http://elmorigin.wix.com/originofelm
http://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/deep-learning-conspiracy.html
Dear All,
There is an ongoing discussion on this question involving Jurgen Schmidhuber and Yann LeCun. Please follow the following link:
https://plus.google.com/100849856540000067209/posts/9BDtGwCDL7D
Here I found open response from the authors of ELM.
Huang G-B. Reply to comments on ‘the extreme learning machine’.
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2008;19(8):1495–6.
There is also open letter to the journal regarding the ELM
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4589007&tag=1
- Badges
- Science topic