"Universes were created from a single particle as a result of the big bang."
That is not the standard interpretation of big bang cosmologies. In fact, all that such cosmologies really say is that the Universe is expanding and therefore must have been much smaller and dense in the past. Classical singularity theorems say that if we "wind the clock back" far enough, then we reach a classical singularity. At this point our classical theory of gravity, i.e., general relativity breaks down. However, it is generally accepted that before this point is reached, quantum effects of space-time will become important and regulate this classical singularity. As we do not have a full theory of quantum gravity one cannot really say much more. In short, Big Bang cosmologies say nothing about the "initial singularity" and do not state that this is a particle.
"Are we heading for a second big ban resulting from a single micro chip containing immeasurable information and processes ? "
I don't see why this would lead to something like that. Where did that question come from?