Fermat's last theorem was finally solved by Wiles using mathematical tools that were wholly unavailable to Fermat.
Do you believe
A) That we have actually not solved Fermat's theorem the way it was supposed to be solved, and that we must still look for Fermat's original solution, still undiscovered,
or
B) That Fermat actually made a mistake, and that his 'wonderful' proof -which he did not have the necessary space to fully set forth - was in fact mistaken or flawed, and that we were obsessed for centuries with his last "theorem" when in fact he himself had not really proved it at all?
BTW, I've found a proof for n >= min(a,b).
If n is sufficiently big, then (a+1)^n > a^n + b^n
and therefore a^n + b^n lies between two
nth powers of subsequent natural numbers.
http://www.augos.com/diverses/Fermat_en.html
Regards,
Joachim
Of course its impossible, please enjoy my Fermat's proof
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301674377_Fermat%27s_Last_Theorem_Proof_fixed_edition?ev=prf_pub
Data Fermat's Last Theorem (Proof) (fixed edition)
I accept answer A.
Please review the links below for a simpler proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.
Working Paper A Simpler Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem
Data Proved a statement about a conditional Diophantine equation
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematics