31 Questions 516 Answers 0 Followers
Questions related from Gary Stephens
Who can tell me why Dingle's objection to Special Relativity-- the same one that appears in Barter's book "Relativity and Reality- a re-intepretation of the anomalies appearing in the Theory of...
22 February 2023 3,156 17 View
Apropos the Meissner Effect : how is a totally still magnetic field expelled from the interior of a superconducting body, when it is cooled below the transition temperature? From whence do the...
03 January 2023 1,449 7 View
Why isn't the velocity of light given by the speed of the observer plus the speed of the light (addition of velocities)? Why does the light ray slow down and compensate or speed up and...
26 December 2022 9,165 23 View
A superfluid cannot be retarded by a mechanical or otherwise force, -- it is absolutely resistance-less, --this is by its very definition as a superfluid. AND A superfluid is retarded by the...
01 November 2022 1,448 6 View
My speculation : Cf. Some thoughts on the Edge of the Universe, and Mankind
01 January 1970 8,483 99 View
Is there a misspeak in Einstein's train and embankment thought experiment, as described by Einstein in the 1952 edition of his book "Relativity, the Special and General Theory"...
01 January 1970 2,709 100 View
How else can we explain : Imprimis : That a light ray has different lengths for different observers. (cf. B.) ii. That the length of a light ray is indeterminate? - both gigantic, and nothing,...
01 January 1970 5,759 3 View
Cf. below, Dingle--Michelson Morley experiment. Case of receding mirrors. -------------------------------------------------------------------- For the case (below) of mirrors receding uniformly...
01 January 1970 9,848 2 View
Cf. "Einstein's light-clock." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mpw68rvF4pc If we transfer the argument to the Einstein- train embankment thought experiment, in which two rays are emitted...
01 January 1970 2,422 5 View
The reason I'm quite sure the described curiosity exists in Nature, is the following : Imprimis: we can synchronise clocks either end of the rod. Thereafter, we can introduce a timing off-set,...
01 January 1970 8,531 27 View
01 January 1970 9,175 33 View
William of Ockham appears to have got it right back in the twelve to thirteen hundreds (c.1287-1347) --cf. above. The proof is the "null" result of the 1887 Michelson Morley experiment, as...
01 January 1970 1,980 2 View
Einstein tries to justify (below) that an accelerated reference frame (train carriage) may be considered "at rest" but in an equiv. gravitational field. However, the frame it is moving relative to...
01 January 1970 3,252 85 View
The former is the notion of the "Relativity of Simultaneity". This is not actually the case. Instead, there is a tapestry of Absolute events, in the manner of Newton. The proof of this is given...
01 January 1970 6,293 21 View
“ Of course where there are no parts—where there is absolute Unity— where the tendency to oneness is satisfied—there can be no Attraction:— this has been fully shown, and all Philosophy admits...
01 January 1970 9,782 4 View
Costa de Beauregard made a study of EPR -type correlations,--- entanglement phenomena. His conclusion is that the separated matter is tied together either in its past, or in its future (so called...
01 January 1970 3,637 0 View
Is it a colourized picture from the 1920s? If it is a later picture, circa 1960s? then how is it possible that we have a "dead region"-- no trees, and an "alive region," within feet of each...
01 January 1970 2,771 99 View
If I connected my voltmeter leads across the left-hand crossbar in the top figure, the voltmeter would presumably read an e.m.f of "E"? But then, what would my voltmeter read for the left-hand...
01 January 1970 7,374 9 View
The above experiment may be performed (approximated) at home. It consists of wires bent as pictured, two crossbar "runners" ---wooden handles could be attached to these, and a large coil - a...
01 January 1970 4,423 10 View
The paradox we are about to relate (or a close resemblance) goes back to 1963 (at the very least,) in a Fig. 2c of a paper by Buchta [1], although its true origin may well be much earlier. Klein...
01 January 1970 2,017 17 View
One can see that Special Relativity and General Relativity are in error from the below wiki figure, purporting to show the "Relativity of Simultaneity" Cf....
01 January 1970 8,375 13 View
What actual evidence is there, (incontrovertible evidence) that space and time are warped? Why were all the plates to the 1919 Solar Eclipse expeditions mysteriously "lost"...
01 January 1970 8,616 9 View
As we can see, at t = 0 --- both diagrams are fine. But for t = 1 and t = 2 the top and bottom diagrams clearly show two realities. In the top diagram, the light emanates from the middle of...
01 January 1970 8,930 48 View
That time and space are left untouched. The alteration or change is with light. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mpw68rvF4pc To my mind the errors are here : 2.25 "But remember, we've agreed...
01 January 1970 6,481 100 View
Is the -apparent- progress of light, along the left and right-hand limbs, different for different observers?-- in the standard arrangement for the Relativity of Simultaneity, as suggested by the...
01 January 1970 9,220 1 View
Recent discoveries in Science and Nature, have suggested the Genome is much younger than was previously thought....
01 January 1970 8,693 84 View
In this variation of the Einstein train-embankment experiment we have two observers, one at the left-end of the carriage, and one at the left-end of the platform. If light can only propagate at...
01 January 1970 8,266 56 View
Edwin Hubble was "horrified" ---his word not mine, that the red-shift meant the Heavens were being stretched out from a very particular place--- the Earth. As Fred Hoyle says " . . the...
01 January 1970 3,793 20 View
--------- Precis-------- The light-ray would have to hit the top-mirror (the receding mirror) in the middle, in both the stationary frame (top figure,) and in the moving frame (bottom figure),...
01 January 1970 8,261 60 View
Extracted from 1905. Confer also : On Einstein’s use of the classical addition of velocities (c...
01 January 1970 7,130 39 View
01 January 1970 8,588 0 View
