I am interested to see if you have considered a balance between speech and restricting of such speech. Considering different people have their own triggers, it would be interesting to hear a suggestion on how to create a balance between an individual's personal idea of what constitutes hate speech and truly harmful words. I'm not certain of your home country, but in America we are protected against our words being restricted. Offensive language is protected by our Constitution, I wonder at what point hate speech will restrict us from speaking at all if it is legislated. With the inclusion of "snowflake" in the hate-speech category, where would it end?