What would be the purpose of this type of communication?

If only triggering a certain behavior, than it would be enough just to mark events with results: if A (Mary - have - lamb) > B(vocalize: aaaaa).

But if the purpose of this communication is to communicate meaning, than AI should have what we have - embodied reference of meaning: spatial cognition, affect, prototypical categorization, social context and cultural learning skills. Embodied cognition is the thing that constructs the meaning of any expression.

There are some efforts to create this bottom-up type of embodied AI communication, but I am not sure that AI still matches affective processes necessary for human-like communication. And that is the paradox, its not the cognitive processes that lack description or realization, but the affective part. And this part is essential for meaningful communication.

Valid arguments, I know that just software will not give general understanding or rational capacity but, integrating sensors to the machine so it's capable to feel some environment changes and also people cardiac pulsations, climate, vibrations, positions, location, air pollen, pressure changes, humidity, decibel changes, gases, odors, etc, all this just in between the machine and the individual, then using the DB of affection (constant communication in between individual and computer) it would be possible to create the affection using different DB of affection and personality. For context knowledge I'm using google API that with some algorithms it can filter only what is relevant to my machine and the object of interaction. To make my machine to think on his own, I would use search engines parsing JSON, it makes it search in various 'only related' databases. Example, asking to machine, how do you feel? machine read this like: (How do you feel) = (FFF + ?) this is just a new language for computer, the only thing this computer needs to know about the question is, (MY HEALTH IS and question mark '?' )

So my point is, instead of trying to fit our language or any language that a machine can understand, it would be better to create a human language that represents basic things, without so much grammar that confuses computers, also the different of languages and pronunciation, because this will make AI available for one language like english and that's not fair.

About embodied cognition that construct the meaning of any expression, with a new language that doesn't use meaning, just words it would be possible to transmit the full sentence using hands movements and sounds (integrating hands movement to the equation)