For a fresh beginner, I would like to know the Literature Review to be done for the newly registered PhD topic by a researcher. Some links, video or explanation could help a lot.
Sure, here is a general overview of the process of a literature review:
Define your research question or problem: Before beginning your literature review, you should have a clear understanding of your research question or problem that you are trying to answer or address. This will help you to focus your search and select relevant sources.
Develop a search strategy: Based on your research questions, you should develop a search strategy to identify relevant articles, books, and other sources. This might involve searching databases, online catalogs, and other sources to find relevant literature.
Evaluate sources: Once you have identified potential sources, you will need to evaluate them to determine their relevance and quality. You should consider the author’s credentials, the publication date, the accuracy and completeness of the information, and how well the source relates to your research question.
Analyze and synthesize the literature: Once you have gathered and evaluated the relevant sources, you will need to analyze and synthesize the information. This might involve summarizing the main arguments and findings, identifying key themes or patterns, and comparing and contrasting different sources.
Organize your literature review: As you analyze and synthesize the literature, you should begin to organize your literature review. This might involve creating an outline or visual representation to help organize your ideas.
Write your literature review: Once you have organized your literature review, you should begin to write it up. The literature review should include an introduction that provides background information and context, a main body that summarizes and synthesizes the relevant literature, and a conclusion that summarizes the main findings and identifies any gaps or limitations in the literature.
literature reviewing research is done when there is a topic close to the field being worked on, in order for the researcher to have more clarity and thus to make the topic of the research more contemporary He is a researcher who has followed and is aware of the work of others working in the field, as well These resources will be useful for the research topic and even in the choice of research problem and methods will be useful for the researcher.
There are many sources in English on literature reviewing research such as books, research, articles, etc. Click on this link and you will find the source site
So, as I understand this, the Literature Review is based on the idea that what editors of journals want to see, even more than quality of a piece (to a degree), is originality. So, AFTER your research question, but BEFORE your claim, you provide a review of how other scholars have addressed this topic recently - with the last ten years [so, theoretically, the Lit Review will consist of a survey of ALL of the sources on your particular topic, novel, play, etc.,] in the last ten years. This will help to contextualize the current debate regarding the text on which your are writing (since academic writing is characterized as a conversation or dialogue), and prove that you are taking an approach or addressing the problem in the text in a way that no one has done in recent scholarship. You are making an argument for your own originality.
Literature review has to be the foundation for the research, as it clearly indicates the prior research done on the area so that you might avoid repetition and in addition it gives clue what is the research gap and more precisely to say what remains untouched without exploration. So it is obviously a mandatory thing to do a very serious literature review if at all we want to make our research study an intense one