02 February 2016 4 8K Report

Correctness is widely, but tacitly, understood in the literature on causal inference to be the primary criterion when evaluating the properties of a procedure/method of causal inference. However, I haven't found any reference that actually explains why this is so. Does anyone know an eminent work that explains why correctness should be the primary property of a procedure of causal inference, with completeness etc. following only as secondary criteria?

Similar questions and discussions