Einstein improved the philosophical hypothesis of gravitational physical system from the misfit mechanical olus dubious acting at a distances to the fluidity-laden space time background that has no force. Also he changed the philosophical hypothesis of independency of speed of light towards observers.
Weaknesses still exist but scientists are not motivated to improve them. Instead, they are urged to solve listed problems, some of which are vanity- inspired problems rather than pure.
Physics has stalled in progress or impressionable one as
a field and I think part of the reason is this.
Voila, your wish is my command:
Preprint The Reason for the Constancy of the Speed of Light in the Sp...
Philippos Afxentiou, a simple suggestion: You could have formulated the question in a more correct form: "Why do physicists not promote progress....." The other is another structure altogether in English grammar!
Fundamental Physics. You might like my stuff. https://www.linkedin.com/in/warren-frisina-954a6b185/
Einstein was paid by the American Army good money for his reasearch and to improve the theories. I would do what Einstein has done but my state pension after 30 years of work in gov research and in American tutoring companies is less than 350 USD. Heating and utilities costs exactly 350 USD where I live. They pay with 3 USD/hour physics research in Romania
Normally, physicists prefer to be successful within the received systems, so that they can start out somehow with a new career. In this case, what counts is sticking to the Guide's suggestions. But until one gets established, the time for new ideas is gone. If the person has enough money to back oneself up for a decade without worrying about direct access to a career, and instead to do further study and research. one has the hope today to bring up something well thought out and ready for presentation in a manner that one is perceived as suggesting something new or relatively new.
This is the fortune of the select. They are selected by nature and luck.
What I attempt to do is to limit myself to a little room, pay least, spend least, and study as much as possible. And in the course of time I may have ideas to present. Even if I do not have, I have not lost anything but have only gained, in order to contribute something solid, if not path-breaking.....
This skepticalinquirer article
“…If you read it, you will have a lot of fun!
Can We Trust Peer Review Journals?
Stuart Vyse
https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/can-we-trust-peer-review-journals ….”
- is commented in the recent SS post in
https://www.researchgate.net/post/what_is_the_most_important_problem_in_the_theoretical_physics_now/1534
- and the comment is relevant to this thread question.
Cheers
Philosophy is showing itself up in physix thru "Logic" .Many physicists think things around them ( objective ) are supposed to "behave" according to Logics .It is for this reason that working with and/or understanding Q_Physics turns out to be so strange to them ,,,,,,,,,,,,,
- Badges
- Science topic