A graph of my own creation is presented where slope of the top line represents the change of total energy, field generator thrust plus potential conversion.

A wormhole opens near the maximum and a critical point occurs in the wormhole at the maximum where conversion of potential energy to kinetic energy no longer needs field generator power to proceed.

A crisis can occur if acceleration continues to the right such that reverse engine power becomes insufficient to stop the acceleration. This representation predicts destruction of the vehicle and contents where the three lines meet. Everything converts to gamma rays.

Preston Guynn

Thank you for reply.

There are other quadratic equations. In most general terms the name quadratic requires at least one squared term or rectangular construction. All of the conic sections are quadratic, as are the celestial orbits that approximate them. Some reference list eight or more types of quadratics, including the one you gave.

in the present question and associated graph the squared terms of energy and momentum provide for pc to increase faster than E when curved space must be considered.. The equations are derived from many years of accelerator experiments. Implication is that part of mc2 converts to pc during acceleration which would not happen without the squared terms.

Special relativity does not support the same conclusions in flat space since c and m are constant in SR. Albert Einstein required local light speed to vary under acceleration as shown in his equation 107 and text of Princeton lectures from 1921. It can be shown and was shown in other threads from standard energy and momentum equations that m varies when c varies.

Max Born agreed with Einstein and extended GR to include reverse curvature which relates to kinetic energy in the LaGrange Function and LaGrange Density.

Peter Bergmann disagreed and gave different representations that are most often taught as relativity.

Two choices are possible. The one most often found is that energy must approach infinity for an object with mass to approach light speed. The other choice that I am exploring is that mc2 decreases as velocity increases, converting to pc kinetic energy. The prediction is that mass approaches zero as velocity approaches light speed. It agrees with evidence that massless objects all move at light speed.

Nothing new is required for alternative representation. Standard energy and momentum with Einstein 107 and Max Born interpretation are sufficient.

Dear Jerry Decker

You're wrong with some of your statements.

1st. there is no equation exist to describe of nature.

You're totally incorrect on E.

I'm sure you know Speed of light is counted from electromagnetic light which it is flashlight, not sunlight.

I read all of your statement..

All of them wrong...

with all due respect...

I give up.. to correct them.

read my articles... they might help you...

regards

Thx. I can see where you aim. Nice.

Acceleration or radiation must have a cause (inertia external to this?), and

What exactly do the curvature talk about? This when I read also Einsteins teleparallell gravity contains gravitational torsion in flat space.

Ulla Mattfolk

Javad Fardaei

Thank you for reply and opinions.

E is not my creation. It is much researched by others in particle accelerators.

Mostly I use well established equations found in text books, making a different interpretation than is usually given.

Many writers use constant light speed and constant mass, which is Special Relativity.

Not many researchers are found who are aware that Albert Einstein made light speed a variable in curved apace, although it is easy to find in 1921 Princeton Lecture equation 107. Well established equations make mass a variable when light speed is variable, decreasing mass as light speed increases.

Even fewer researchers are founfd to be aware of Max Born contribution when far from a central mass. which allows kinetic energy to increase local light speed.

LaGrange function is well known but not much understood by those who have not understood variable light speed in curved space.

Peter Bergmann did much to mislead the research community, most of which follows his mistakes and defends them.

My interpretation leads eventually to star travel, while the main stream interpretation does not.

All of my work is well documented and derived from well established science, interpreted a bit differently. Not much of it is uniquely mine, but is collected from the less well known works of famous scientists.

I don't object to you having a different method and conclusion. Competition of ideas is usually good for advancing research,

Max Born contribution when far from a central mass. which allows kinetic energy to increase local light speed.

I am not,but maybe this can be behind the divergence at very small scale? It can then be important there and for the expansion of universe too?

Preston Gyunn: E = mc2 + 0.5m v2 + 3/8m v4/c2 + 5/16 v6/c4 + ...

As Einstein mentioned, obviously the second term is kinetic energy, and he postulated that the first term was "rest energy", the basis for his famous equation when velocity is zero,

Rest energy is not quantized seen like this? It is not possible to divide in two parts? Kinetic energy is, and it is maybe behind the quantum split or branchings? Interesting.

Ulla Mattfolk.

A thought:

E2 = T2 + 2TK + K2 , this is not a pure quantized state, only its 'ends' are. This contains mixed intermediate states also. These intermediate states may be important also for gravity as a 'virtual state' with a virtual massless state?

Dear Friend,

The statements in your question are not precise. First of all, energy is not quadratic it can be of all powers of the appropriate degrees of freedom (generalized coordinates, fields, etc...) only restrictions of symmetry and boundedness from blow constrain its form. Secondly, energy is the sum of kinetic, potential and mass terms.