Why is it that online social media, popular among children and adolescents, continues to use algorithms that promote not only positive but also negative content? Is it just a matter of increasing the reach of the dissemination of certain content, entries, posts, comments, tags, promotional banners, advertising videos, etc. in order to generate higher viewership, more views of certain posts, in order to increase the rates of financial payments for advertisements posted on social media sites, in order to increase the already huge profits of the owners of these sites? Should social media sites pay for recovery, treatment of mental disorders caused by the hejterity directed against them on online social media, maintenance of rehab clinics for treating children and adolescents from online social media addiction, etc.?
Algorithms that promote both positive and negative content on social media, especially popular among children and adolescents, are the result of complex mechanisms of the platforms and their business model. These algorithms are designed to maximize user engagement, which translates into increased time spent on the platform, more ad impressions and higher profits for portal owners. Unfortunately, one of the side effects of these strategies is the promotion of controversial or negative content, which often generates stronger emotions such as anger, fear or outrage. This type of content tends to spread quickly, as users are eager to comment, share and engage with it, which increases its reach.
And what is your opinion on this topic?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Warm regards,
I would like to invite you to join me in scientific cooperation,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Algorithms that promote negative content on social media platforms popular among children and young people continue to be utilized due to several interconnected factors. Primarily, these algorithms are engineered to maximize user engagement by prioritizing content that elicits strong emotional reactions, often resulting in the amplification of negative or inflammatory material. This tendency can create environments that are rife with hostility and misinformation. Additionally, the design of these algorithms often leads to filter bubbles, where users are predominantly exposed to content that aligns with their existing beliefs, further entrenching negative perspectives. This situation is particularly concerning for younger audiences, who may lack the critical skills necessary to navigate these digital landscapes effectively, making them more susceptible to harmful behaviors and attitudes.
Answer: The root-cause is the inherently anti-ethical result of pandemic intoxication by The Five Poisons: 1. Foolish delusion, 2. Insatiable greed, 3. Hostile ill-will, 4. Jealous envy, 5. Arrogant conceit. So, the ecocidal neoRoman empire (global idiocracy) decays ever faster
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Medicine
- Epi
- Age Groups
- Children