Matter, energy, space and time are the creation of the big bang . Matter and energy as we all know are inter convertible, but Space and time are not . Is it true or not?
Dear Mohammad Arfan ,
You are wright about energy -mass.
Time and space is first of all a question of definition.
Time is our time, but time might change with the expansion of the Universe, time accelerate or slow down with the expansion of the Universe.
The space is what is inside our Universe?
What is outside our Universe?
Are there other Universes?
JES
Your question reflects the universal symmetry and fundamental link between mass vs. energy and space vs. time. Yes, space and time can be converted into one another. This property manifests in several areas of physics. In general relativity, the Schwarzschild metric indicates that space becomes timelike and time spacelike at the event horizon r=2m of a black hole. In special relativity, velocity rotates the space and time axes such that they coincide at v=c. In single-particle relativistic quantum mechanics, energy is proportional to the partial with respect to t, momentum the partial with respect to r, and rest mass the partial with respect to invariant path-length s. Conversion of energy to mass thus entails a conversion between space and time.
To state something as
“…Your question reflects the universal symmetry and fundamental link between mass vs. energy and space vs. time.…..”
- is necessary before to understand – what are “Energy”, “Mass”, “Space”, and “Time”, when all these absolutely fundamental physical phenomena/notions aren’t defined correctly in the mainstream physics. Correspondingly that
“…Yes, space and time can be converted into one another…”
- is simply fundamentally wrong fantastic allegation, which, though, is postulated in the SR?GR; etc.
Including when talking about “mass” it is necessary to remember, that in Matter two “masses” exist - "inertial mass", and “gravitational mass”, which are fundamentally different: inertial mass is measure of absolutely fundamental phenomenon/notion “Inertia”, gravitational mass is the charge of the fundamental Nature Force “Gravity”, which is in a few traits similar to the fundamental Nature EM Force, and gravitational mass is some analogue of electric charge.
More about the masses and other phenomena above see, for example, SS posts in the threads:
About “Space” and “Time” - the last and May 28, August 13, November 6 and November 7 SS posts in
https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_the_most_precise_definition_of_time_And_what_is_the_easiest_way_to_describe_time ;
about inertial mass – in the thread https://www.researchgate.net/post/Does_energy_have_mass#view=5cdc351ac7d8ab70605801f6
about gravitational mass – in the thread https://www.researchgate.net/post/Could_we_consider_anti-particles_as_having_negative_mass#view=5d77a1802ba3a1c2c77b5a84
- and papers that are linked in the posts.
Cheers
Only materialist dialectics can offer a perspective of the internal dynamics of Space-Time-Matter-Motion of this infinite, eternal and ever-changing universe, which is mediated by the "virtual particles" of the quantum vacuum.
It is at the same time a refutation of the finite, non-material and abstract four- dimensional spacetime geometric manifold (with supposedly tangible, material, mechanical and metrical attributes) as the ontological basis of objective reality, proposed by Minkowski and Einstein.
Article The Philosophy of Space-Time: Whence Cometh "Matter" and "Motion"?
https://www.amazon.ca/Philosophy-Space-Time-Whence-Cometh-Matter/dp/984041884X
- Badges
- Science topic