Heavy metals and polyaromatic hydrocarbons have been reported in fish(fin and shell fishes). Comparatively, I wish to know the one that has the greater deleterious effect on human when fish polluted with these compounds are ingested.
These links will be useful to find an answer to your question :
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691514001835
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304602554_Potential_effects_of_polycyclic_aromatic_hydrocarbons_PAHs_in_marine_foods_on_human_health_a_critical_review
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269784904_Effect_of_Different_Heavy_Metal_Pollution_on_Fish
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283471216_Heavy_metal_in_fish_Analysis_and_human_health-a_review
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5047865/
Heavy metals and polyaromatic hydrocarbons have been toxic effects for fish and humen but I think the heavy metals have accumulative effects and more toxic
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Zoology
- Ichthyology
- Vertebrates
- Fish