I think, if i understand correctly, that the most important factor is the number of the publications of the journals indexed by Thomson Reuters.

Ok and what do you think of google scholar?

I'm not confident in google scholar because sometimes it considers some publications of other authors, similar in the name with you, belong to you. Then in this case,  the index of google is wrong. This is happened with me. I found under my google scholar a lot of publications which are not of me. Then i got a high wrong index. But for honesty, i deleted them.

Regards

Mohamed 

I strongly agree with you, I have the same problem and each time I delete them

On the basis of indicators supplied by GOOGLE SCHOLAR, reachergate and SCOPUS

I'm more confident on SCOPUS

Scopus is more confidence, i guess

Dear Djamila, Toufik, and Nabil:

A ranking based on the H index seems to be a tendency in many countries (it seems that IEEE use it also). However the issue is to get the right number. In this context, RG seems to vey interesting as it allows calculating the H index excluding auto-citation.

Best regards,

Mohamed

Dear Professor Mohamed,

I agree that the H index is important and what do you think of google scholar?

Dear Prof. Rekioua,

It seems that Google Scholar starts to be adopted by universities as an evaluation tool (just to have an idea). Thomson reuters has something equivalent but it is payment-based (access to citations and so on).

PS. In France Google Scholar-based H index is used and an additional information for researcher evaluation for promotion purposes.

Best regards,

Mohamed