I am not an expert in this field, but I am very interested and have researched to find an answer. I received some assistance from tlooto.com for this response. Could you please review the response below to see if it is correct?

For RNA extraction from oyster tissue, both 1-bromo-3-chloropropane (BCP) and traditional chloroform (Trichloromethane) are viable options. However, BCP is generally preferred due to its lower toxicity, providing a safer working environment. Research indicates that BCP can yield high RNA purity and integrity with reduced DNA contamination, crucial for downstream applications like RT-PCR [1]. Additionally, BCP enhances phase separation clarity, minimizing interphase contamination [2]. While traditional chloroform is effective, its higher toxicity and potential for increased DNA contamination make BCP a better choice for ensuring high-quality RNA extraction from oyster tissues [1][2].

Reference

[1] Tanaka, T., Akiba, T., Mori, K., Noguchi, Y., Hayashi, Y., Konuma, H., Yoshida, Y., & Yamada, S. (2007). Comparison and Evaluation of Methods for RNA Extraction of Norovirus from Oyster. Nihon Shokuhin Biseibutsu Gakkai zasshi, 24, 157-162.

[2] Gouveia, G., Ferreira, S., Ferreira, J., Siqueira, S., & Pereira, J. (2014). Comparison of Two Methods of RNA Extraction from Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Specimens. BioMed Research International, 2014.

In RNA extraction protocols, both 1-bromo-3-chloropropane (BCP) and traditional chloroform (methylidyne trichloride) are widely used to separate nucleic acids in methods such as acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. The choice between these two reagents depends on specific factors such as toxicity, ease of use and efficiency of separation of RNA from DNA.

Separation efficiency: Both BCP and chloroform are effective in separating RNA from DNA during the extraction process. The acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method has been the gold standard for this purpose for decades, yielding high quality RNA by selectively partitioning DNA and protein into the organic and interphase layers while leaving RNA in the aqueous phase (Chomczyński & Sacchi, 1987). One study suggests that methods using BCP as the organic phase instead of traditional chloroform still achieve similar RNA purity and yield, with a lower risk of toxic exposure (Chey et al., 2011).

Toxicity and safety: A major advantage of BCP is its lower toxicity compared to chloroform. Chloroform is highly toxic, carcinogenic and poses serious handling safety concerns. Therefore, BCP is often recommended as a safer alternative in laboratories concerned with reducing exposure to hazardous chemicals (Siebert & Chenchik, 1993).

Contamination and RNA integrity: Both chloroform and BCP provide effective RNA extraction with minimal DNA contamination when used correctly. However, minor procedural variations, such as pH adjustments and handling of the interphase layer, have a greater effect on contamination levels than the choice of chloroform type. In addition, BCP has shown similar or better consistency in preventing DNA contamination in some protocols, making it a viable substitute without compromising RNA integrity (Suzuki et al., 2008).

Conclusion

1-Bromo-3-chloropropane is generally the better choice for RNA extraction when safety is a priority due to its lower toxicity, while maintaining comparable efficacy in separating RNA from DNA with minimal risk of contamination. It adapts well to the widely used acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction protocols.

Ref..

• Chomczyński, P., & Sacchi, N. (1987). Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Analytical Biochemistry, 162(1), 156-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(87)90021-2
• Chey, S., Claus, C., & Liebert, U. (2011). Improved method for simultaneous isolation of proteins and nucleic acids. Analytical Biochemistry, 411(1), 164-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2010.11.020
• Siebert, P., & Chenchik, A. (1993). Modified acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform RNA extraction method which greatly reduces DNA contamination. Nucleic Acids Research, 21(8), 2019-2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/21.8.2019
• Suzuki, Y., Mae, T., & Makino, A. (2008). RNA extraction from various recalcitrant plant tissues with a cethyltrimethylammonium bromide-containing buffer followed by an acid guanidium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform treatment. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 72, 1951-1953. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.80084

Thanks, Phil.