It happened to me 20 years ago about the filter scales of a multispectral camera.
I laugh when I saw the mistake two years after.
But now, when I show some processing images, scientists says: "it is impossible, we tried this with our hightech camera and it don't work!"...
As a scientist, you can design, perform and publish a study which would refute/clarify the previous work. Alternatively, one can write a so called "letter to the editor" and elucidate your point of view.
Thanks A lot Eugen,
Lost in my théories and mechanics, I searched a way to to publish my results.
But it is so different of what exists that a lot of stupid discuss could appear.
I didn't understand that the answer was so simple.
To explain why the robber made a mistake, I may explain all my mechanics and then my results will be based on a solid example.
Thanks again!
I am so stupid.
I will quote you in my publication.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Physical Sciences
- Waves