Soon the blind will see again, but first the 'paper castle', built out of arrogance, will have to come down, simply with just a 'flick'.

Yes KT, the Universe is created. To create the Universe a perfect mathematical system was used, This system of sequences in fractal system for growth and expansion...is the mathematical infrastructure for everything.

I found a 'natural' mathematical matrix composed of 336 (288+48) elements that happens to be in amazing relationship/correlation to the description of the 7 branched Menorah given in the Torah.

Its based on our decimal system (yes that’s why we have ten fingers and not the other way around) that infinitely repeats this 336 'pattern' or 'constant' (amazingly missed by the billion dollar universities).

Interesting thing is that not only we have the seven days (matrices) expressed in a sequence of numbers but even the 24 daily hours, 12 daylight and 12 night (symmetrical similar). Its ALL in this mathematical matrix.

Even more interesting the resulting numbers of the Menorah Matrix, so called by me, happen to give the size of the Earth, Moon and Sun in miles, yes in miles! AND the RATIOS for dimensions and distances of the same. Including the Moon's perihelion and aphelion all within one 10th of 1%!

If that wasn’t enough the central axis of this 7 branched mathematical matrix happen to give the angle of the inclination of Earth's axis at 23.4!. Of course for the brilliant mind of today these are all coincidences! AND Yes, the precession of equinoxes is there also!

There's more about the solar system… but what I found interesting is that by using the 'laws' of this mathematical system I found a precise mathematical infrastructure to data of the Genetic Code (published by scientists and found on the internet). Thru this mathematical system I found a perfect mathematical system to that data and I could easily derive mathematically why we have precisely 20 unique Amino Acids and not 19 or 21 or 55 for that manner. But there's more...

The reason why we have a 'common ancestor' is because all living system are based on the same mathematical Matrix! That’s how we explain the Cambrian explosion, for example.

This system explains easily why we have the octet rule in chemistry… etc.. And why the 360 degrees of a circle its NOT just an arbitrary convention but it is embedded in the laws of the decimal system (easy to demonstrate with this system) … but there is much more about this too… 360 is essential 'principle/code' that stands at the foundation of all the laws for spin and movement in creation, from the subatomic to astronomic.

I know… science today is dealing with 'big things' like extra dimensions, multi universes that no one can check the validity of and anyhow with theories developed with math that very few understand… maybe not even who writes it… I call it the new religion!

That’s science today…in the meantime no one sees the elephant in the room...

Science says...Numbers can ONLY describe nature, but it will have to be recognized very soon that all Nature and everything is mathematically based, set by an intelligence way beyond are current reach and even imagination.

A day soon approaching is coming that everyone will smile at the how naively humans could believe what they do today…

Mr Towe, first let me say that I appreciate that you replied to my 'frustrated' comment, but its long coming but of course not because of you. I say this because the usual response I receive from today's 'High Priests' is with their modern version of burning at stake… silence and ostracism.

Not that I am surprised. I have researched much scientific literature to know how many scientists have received this same response (silence and ostracism) in the past and even nowadays when some 'original thinkers' have tried to propose a new theory that wasn't in line with the 'establishment'. Imagine the expectations of someone that not only goes 'against the current' but also has no credentials posted on his profile. Of course it is well known how many (too many), new ideas have been initially treated with ridicule, to put it lightly, in the scientific community. This continued until eventually were validated (sometimes decades or more later) and then were praised and everyone finally jumped on the bandwagon (some were dead by the time they theories were recognized as valid).

Let me say first that my critic is not about science and scientists in general but just to the kind that wants to force upon us theories not at all properly confirmed and proven scientifically, evolution to speak of one.

Lots of science research and achievements I greatly admire, technology of course but much more in every field.

Many times I walked in Harvard and MIT campuses and I'd sit down under a tree to read a book for a while and wished I had studied there or did research in the field of physics or biology for example.

I never thought I would some day, pursuing a very simple mathematical idea, 'stumble' upon a discovery that was as interesting as I could have never imagined it.

I know! I'm making a big claim, but, for many reasons I wont be able to explain here, I have no doubts this Matrix and its mathematical properties will soon be proved to be scientifically valid and will be studied everywhere, in every school and university. In time this system will take us forward technologically by leaps and bounds and in all scientific fields. It will lead us to the understanding of the basic forces of Nature, like anti-gravity for example.

To answer your question, I have to ask you a question. Aren't you naive to believe that what is presented to the world as fossils evidence to prove evolution is enough proof? There is a pretty sizable and growing number of scientists that are very skeptical nowadays of the 'evolution' theory. Are they also naïve or unqualified? In the last ten or twenty years research is showing that the complexity of life and especially the biological life is so complex.. so much so that the 13 billion or so years of the Universe's lifetime, as defined by science, isn't long enough for the random and 'lucky' cell hypothesis, never mind from that to us. Moreover, this doesn’t explain what is now considered by many scientists the 'irreducible complexity' of biological systems which points NOT to a random and unguided process of life, never mind explaining the rise of self-awareness from a 'blob' of nothingness.

Many studies today already point clearly to a 'digital' type of system present in the Genetic Code. Even the Golden Ratio (already established as fact in plants, bodies and all living systems together with the Fib sequence) has been presented already as a determinant aspect of the frequency of codons by a research laboratory and much more I wont go into now. We have come to realize how little we know of the massive network of information sharing that happens between cells, not to mention their interrelation with organs and with the variety of systems present in our body of course all inter-networked to create a one 'unison' consciousness of all these billions of diverse parts . What about the storing of information? How is information stored and transmitted without a mathematical infrastructure is not explained also by science today. There must be an 'oral tradition' amongst cells?! :) What else could be so precise and 'economical' and efficient than a mathematical infrastructure for any kind of system? Did scientists give us an alternative to how information is filed, stored and transmitted that isn't mathematically based? No, but at the same time they want us to BELIEVE their theory.

But lets leave that aside for a moment. Could you explain where are the million upon million of fossils that we should have been able to have found by now since the evolution from one cell or molecule to all animal species and then humans? We should have so many fossils now to fill a State size laboratory not the very 'few pieces' we see in some museums!

Between aquatic and four legged mammals, for example (never mind the innumerable other steps) we should have an ENORMOUS amount of in-between fossils from one stage to the other in the many very small steps it would have been NECESSARY. The very few found fossils (from the number that would have be expected to be found) presented as evidence that do seem to have some attributes or features as an in-between two species could very well be what they are… just a different species with features 'in-between' two species.

Where are the fossils of animals with wrong designed knees, for example? Should we believe they came to be so perfect without examples of ONE of the 'wrongly' designed one that are now extinct and we can find evidence of? It seems that species happened magically, creating complex machines without leaving traces of any major mistake? What about all other organs and bones and the many complex body systems?

Every single step or function would take millions of 'try-outs', in a random natural selection hypothesis and then to make in in relation to all other parts like organs, systems etc...

Mr Towe, respectfully, until there is better evidence of this fairy tale (evidence I am sure will never be found), you have decided to practically believe to a theory in a religious fashion, yes you are a 'believer' of this theory and this is not how a scientist should be.

Do you know how the 'common ancestor' theory is explained?

There is ONE mathematical matrix and system for all living things, organic and non-organic, that’s why.

Not the fairy tale the Universities are telling us, the lucky 'appearance' of a single DNA/cell/molecule from which all living species and systems have originated. Then again, IF the conditions were good for life for one why not more than one cell came to life? If the conditions were right we should have seen an explosion of different systems. If not many why not at least two or three? The reason given for why we have just one 'ancestor' is just another fairy tale that fits the theory! But of course you can believe what you will… but please do NOT CLAIM that your belief is science because it is not.

Again, our 'common origin' is common not because of a common 'organic' ancestor BUT because of ONE mathematical infrastructure and system. Moreover, not just ANY mathematical system, as it will be verified, but specifically the decimal system. In time scientists and mathematicians will realize how much more there is to know about the decimal system and how amazingly fantastic are the innumerable inherent properties of this mathematical system still not known unfortunately by scientists. And again… Just like we use our ten fingers to 'create' objects, the Creator used the decimal system to set the laws of creation. Remember we were told that we were made in the image of the Creator.

Numbers, it will be found, are the 'essence' of natural forces, in Platonic fashion. Forces are inherently 'numbered' (numbers and forces are inherently one and the same) and of course respond and interact by simple but intricate numeric laws. But I wont even try to explain more of this here.

Yes, Plato and Pythagoras were right! What a geniuses compare to some arrogant, superficial buffoons of today that pompously go on debates (I saw many of them on YouTube) with their 'know it all' attitude as if they really knew what life is all about! They want to believe that 'no intelligence' can create intelligence, and nothingness creates self-awareness, fine, enjoy your belief or from my part, your lack of common sense, but at least have the decency not to boast as if you really knew anything about ANYTHING in any REAL depth.

Going back to the evolution theory, I do realize of course that within species, there is a so called micro evolution or better referred to as adaptation to environment… or microevolution but THAT is something completely different and easily explainable even in a matrix (mathematical structured) based Universe.

I could go on for hours just on this but you can find a lot of great info online if you are open minded about it and do not dismiss something just because it doesn’t reflect your preconceived belief. But I want to point out one thing that I believe in a way its even more important, but Im sure not at all for you, and I know it is not a scientific proof either, for now, because even this will be found to be scientific in time, and that is Beauty. I know that’s the part that mostly you will feel so superior from the height of the pedestal you have positioned yourself on.

For the evolutionists life is the product of 'selfish' hungry cells/molecules/genes that just want to eat and reproduce.

Nature though is entirely filled with an OVERABUNDANCE of seemingly 'useless' beauty that goes WAY beyond any necessity and reason for survival. The beauty of colors and shapes are so amazingly arranged on butterflies for example and flowers and plants and then millions of varieties of species that even the best architects and designers would have a hard time (if you believe they could ever imagine such a thing) put together something in that fashion. The balance in the choice of colors and shapes and proportions especially is astounding.

How is a 'blind system' controlling and checking the straightness or width of zebra's stripes? Is there a cell based committee making decisions?? Who's checking the results? Who's reporting it to the cells??? Oh yes, millions of try outs and the Zebra with the lucky straight stripes won the survival battle? Where are the millions of zebra with wrongly zig zag designed stripes before they finally reached the right design? A different stripe would have created a weakness in survival? What about the millions of other species that in amazing balance of choices show off harmonic colors, proportions and what not? Never mind… I know the advertising styled answers given… please do not come up with the fairy tales built upon another fairy tale. Stick to science and actual proof when you open your mouth not to fantastic theories.

So much could be said just on this… It is sad that an 'evolutionist' would look in the eyes of his beautiful 'princess' daughter and see just a sophisticated robot and not the beautiful Divine Being she really is. Or to see the astounding breathtaking beauty of a beautiful woman as the product of hungry cells with no sense of proportion, to speak of one. Why not green hair? Why not red eyes? Which cell decided not this but the other… where are the EXAMPLES of the wrongly red eyed or green hair versions, you fools! Consider a blonde colored hair. Where else is in Nature just like that? Coincidence, like us? What blind system could possibly create such an unusual color? I am sorry, but the ONLY proof of blind, unguided evolution if ANY is the evolutionist themselves!

There is a huge number of famous scientists also credited with Noble prizes, but not only, from the past and contemporary ones that openly do not agree with your belief on evolution. My question to you is… Are they naïve for not considering your 'few bones' as evidence of your (evolutionist) 'story' and of how life came to be?

Do you believe that just because you and all the other 'evolutionists' were born after Newton, Planck, Heisenberg, Schrodinger and many, many other amazing scientists (leaders NOT followers, original geniuses not parrots) of the past not to speak of the many contemporary ones, that you know better than them because you have decided to believe without scientific proof on a random, lucky Universe? Most, if not all, great science geniuses felt there was a 'creative and organizing principle' at work in the Universe. Are these exceptional guys all naïve and you are the one that knows it all?

Oh no wait! Scientists have found a way to circumvent the 'time' issue, if there was just one issue! Statistically with the old interpretation, cells had all the time needed to evolve randomly out of 'try-outs'. Lucky them! With the recently recognized high complexity of cells there was not enough time anymore to evolve.

So here they go with the new fairy tale answer! We are one of many, no wait, infinite number of Universes and out of this infinite number of Universes, set each in a different dimension, lucky us, because we are in the Universe where life incredibly DID happened and we are here to prove that! Really??? Is this what science has become?! Fine, believe it! but do not tell us that you have proven life came from nothingness!

What a bunch of arrogant fools (some) scientists have become! Brilliant minds for sure but wasted because of wanting to believe their preconceived ideas. Evolutionists have become like the guy that first shoots arrows in the trees and then afterwards paints a target around them and goes around advertising he is a great archer!

I believe anyhow that this useless fossil quest still ongoing won't be necessary (at least for this cause) when the 'mathematical structured universe' is officially recognized by scientists.

I believe that some scientists are just still afraid of a child like image they want to run away from, of an old god with white hair, long beard and just there to punish them… Please grow up!

Of course damage has been done by a terrible religious culture, distorted by wicked men, that made something originally pure and great the source of such a disgrace in certain aspects.

But please you have given time and brains to dig deeper now…

I wonder how scientist can believe that the huge amount of information that needs to be transferred, stored, exchanged etc amongst all cells and systems could be done without a mathematical infrastructure. Think of the huge 'filing' system just for the many and 'different kind' s of memory systems and data storing. What about the information error-checking function? How can the system(s) possible know what is wrong without a stored 'filing system' or 'template' of the ideal original. What language is used by the cell? But this is just a minute aspect of all the billion of operations going on every single fraction of second!

Scientists sometimes puzzle me when they speak as they really know what is going on... So much so that they can be sure and boast to know how life came to be…

I tried to speak with some professors about my findings but with no luck, but I have not pushed it either to say the truth. I also have mentioned my discovery on sites such as this and even though hundreds have read the comments and checked my profile NOT one of them had any questions or whatever. I am still working on presenting it soon, maybe I will just post it on a website even though my initial intention was to write a book.

Would you think that someone working/studying/researching on the Genetic Code would be interested in finding out more about my work, maybe even if just to get an idea to develop further? What about the mathematically inclined professor or engineer or researcher? Big claim of mine to say that there is, within our decimal system, a mathematical infrastructure filled with patterns and structure still unrecognized, like the 360 pattern and much more. Would you think they would ask some questions or ask where they can check it out? No! They must be thinking, How is it possible that this guy without any credentials wants to tell me anything that is worth my time?

Well, the fact is, math doesn't lie and it isn't open to opinions. Sooner than later it will be recognized.

You know what made this system 'invisible' to mathematicians so far? Ill make you laugh. Arrogance! yes there it is again. You may ask, how can the quality or character of a person have anything to do with the science of mathematics. To give you a simple metaphor, this is like one of those optical illusion images in which depending on your eye focus you see one image or the other but not both at the same time. You can see for example two people kissing or a chalice. It depends on your focus, you see what you want to see, one or the other. That’s what happened in mathematics, they have only seen what they believed was there to be seen. But as they will find out soon, there is much more 'hiding' under their nose, so to speak.

This dimension of mathematics deals with the patterns and constants built-in the system and correspondingly to the forces of Nature and describes how they balance and break symmetry at the same time.

Do you think that someone will ask me now anything about this? I doubt it. But I will keep myself open to be surprised.

Maybe you think that Moses 3000 years ago had a Mac or PC (your choice) somewhere in hiding and used it to discover this 'hidden' 7 branched matrix and write it down for us in the Torah? (never mind the other innumerable mathematical puzzles found lately with the computerized Torah). Maybe Moses had some secret measuring device to calculate the distances and dimensions within our Solar System and beyond? Maybe he even knew how this mathematical matrix fit perfectly, like a glove, to empirical data of the Genetic Code?

Well, how could you possibly explain the description of the Menorah in such precise details in Exodus and for it to be perfectly the same as the mathematical matrix I have found?

Many have already also related the Menorah to the first verses of the Bible for the seven days of creation with the 24 Hours etc. Well the matrix confirms their findings 100%! Did Moses know all this? The Menorah Matrix is clearly the mathematical 'version' of the seven days of creation. How science can explain to me this? Can it?

Yes, there are small 'deviations' (all within a certain range) to NASA's data vs the 'ideal' numbers of this mathematical matrix and that is for dimensions, distances and ratios within our planetary system. But what clearly transpires is that those deviations are ALSO inherently important in the perfection of creation. Out of this mathematical 'rigid' structure there has to be room for just a bit of deviation from the 'ideal'. Expressed in few words and simple terms, it is to create a balancing between uniqueness and similarity.

Imagine if the world was 'cartoon' like where all the leaves on a tree were perfectly the same shape and size! It wouldn’t be beautiful as we recognize beauty. Yes, within the basic structure and limits on shapes and dimension of the leaves we want to see a uniqueness to each one! And of course the same goes for all other living things and processes in Nature, and that includes us and all the planetary dimensions and distances and ratios around us! That's why the perfect nature of the 'deviations'!

Regarding the Genetic Code instead this mathematical system is totally PERFECT. No deviations there in all its aspects. I am sure some potential deviations are set there somewhere… but I have no idea how that works yet.

The computer like structure of the DNA's bases, converted to this matrix system is astounding. Upon wanting to see a corroborating evidence I decided to check if the computer would give me precisely 20 'Amino Acids'. I was thrilled to see that that was precisely what the computer produced. Am I saying that this is scientific proof yet? No, what I saying is that this is huge evidence (that will lead eventually to proof) and I wished some scientists would take it where I can not, sooner than later.

Im tired of writing and I need an expresso…

Mr Towe,

You are a nice person and for sure intelligent, unfortunately also with all the symptoms as you were a member of a cult, named 'evolution', perhaps.

Try to speak with someone that is a member of a cult and you will understand. You can speak for hours about something that for anyone else made perfect sense, logical and even based on verifiable facts. What is the cult member going to do?

They will disregard your argument completely, as if you hadn't spoken at all, while being very ready to tell you what they think are compelling and rational reasons why they are 100% right about their ideas and that you just cannot see the truth they see… and you should join them as well!

First, I have no invested reason NOT to accept that life could have been setup by the Creator following an evolutionary process. BUT as it turns out, my findings are indicating otherwise. The findings give evidence that LIFE is mathematically structured from its inception, at EVERY LEVEL and each 'dimension' set in a 'fractal like expansion', all from a specific set of mathematical laws based on ' inner' laws of the decimal system.

If you think that I'm by myself on these 'sort of ideas' you are wrong. There is a lot of researches made by many scientists from all over the world that supports my findings (number structured physics etc). Did you read about ? One, two of them at least? I doubt it! Are those presented at least as an alternative to 'open horizons' for students in Universities? No. of course not. Is this true science??

The only way to find out about these researches is online. Many scientists unfortunately do not know about these new researches so focused they are on what they have been taught and/or working long hours on what they are paid for, set by someone else.

A cult member just reads the literature that supports his point of view. Or as in your case you did read it but again, as if I hadn't spoken because my 'version' of things just can NOT have, for you, any significant value. But let me tell you that all the scientists that right now are being treated as heretics by the high priests of science, that control what the world has to BELIEVE, will soon have their day. Incredibly the roles have been reversed from the Medieval 'Church' to the current one! If you want clear example of this I can give you more than you can read in your lifetime.

Second, yes my 'strong' reply was and is not so much for the scientists that believe in evolution per se BUT that the ones that ALSO DO believe that life originated by RANDOM AND LUCKY EVENTS. These scientists (the boasting and arrogant 'know it all' type) are the real insane members of the 'evolution cult' that I, and soon everyone else, will referred to as 'the buffoons'.

I mentioned about fossils in my reply ONLY because you have asked me about it (unlike you, dismissing the core of my message). My findings touch a more basic level of life. Meaning that IF they are verified as true (as it transpires from the evidence ) than the fossils questions/issue gets answered automatically, by default of those results.

It will make the 'interpretation' of the fossils data very different, in line with the new findings.

Because you are so involved in telling your story and belief, you have completely dismissed my findings/discovery sent to you in the previous message, with lack of any comments or opinions or questions.

I do understand you have no way to know if I'm just inventing the whole thing here or if maybe unbeknownst to me I'm just plain wrong. What is important to notice though is that even though the claim I make is big, it passed right thru you as it was an inconsequential detail vs what you preconceive as 'truth'.

So again... IF what I claim is true (all is number as Pythagoras said), what does that do to your evolution assumption?

I had no intention to return to the fossil 'thing' that is 'overplayed' already by people smarter than me but I just want to point out few of the 'issues' that some of your colleagues have highlighted thru the years, including scientists from reputable Universities as well.

Trilobites: Virtually no previous ancestors have been found (that's a hard body creature)

Transitional forms: Not even close in number and variety to what would be rightly expected from molecules to humans for example, never mind the 'side-way' transitions.

Lack of ANY evidence at any stage of any animal in the process to transition to a different (new) specie.

'Equilibrium'. Many life forms (especially between animal and plants) need a second one to survive (bees/flowers etc)

Also, chicken is born by an egg or vice versa? This is much more puzzling and hard to explain by evolutionists if you understand the intricate dynamics at stake and REAL issues involved and NOT resolved or understood.

Cambrian explosion: sudden appearance of most phyla types, not gradual evolution.

And this list could go on until your eyes fall out...

I just wanted to give you a short samples of issues raised by scientists BUT AGAIN what I am proposing stands alone. I do not need any validation from fossils' interpretation because there is NOT more validation than a MATHEMATICAL VALIDATION applied EMPIRICALLY at every level, from the MICRO TO THE MACRO dimensions.

It's only the pre-determined idea that it can NOT be possible to even consider an Intelligence as the source of Life that is predetermining the analysis of ANY data to conform that way. So you 'see' what you want to see by tweaking the data a little bit here and a little bit there until it makes somewhat sense in line with what you believe.

Lets not forget the fact that scientists would have to explain how someone 3000 years ago could compute such a mathematical matrix without a computer or at least a calculator.

Did any University tell you how the Great Pyramid was built, yet? Many mechanical engineers have stated that most likely not even today we would be able to build such a structure not just for its size but for its innumerable 'scientific' characteristics embedded within it, in a variety of 'levels', one of which being the alignment with the True North which is even more precise than the our 'new' built observatory in Greenwich. And lets not forget that initially the Great Pyramid was covered with an exterior surface that was smooth and white like one piece of marble. I can only imagine the beauty of it before they used the stones to build Cairo. I do not think that many understand or give the right weight to the implications of these facts.

Do you know what the Torah says about it? I doubt it.

"In that day shall there be an altar to the Lord in the midst of the land of Egypt, and a pillar at the border thereof to the Lord. And it shall be for a sign and for a witness unto the Lord of hosts in the land of Egypt." (Isaiah 19:19)

'Your' Universities did not explain to you the reason why the Great Pyramid was built with those specific dimensions, or why that specific angle, or why 210 courses, or why at that specific distance from the Nile's Delta and so many more whys to fill a book.

Why? Because they do not know. And the reason is because all this info is hidden within the 'inner dimension' of the decimal system and the builders of the Great Pyramid knew the 'Menorah Matrix' because it PERFECTLY gives all these dimensions which in turn relate to the astronomical position of the Earth in our Planetary System, the Moon and the Sun which in turn are in 'fractal' relationship to our DNA's data, but this is just the beginning of the story. Nothing of the Great Pyramid is built by chance but follows strict rules of a precise mathematical matrix.

Do you really believe that farmers built the Great Pyramid with copper chisels as stated in universities' books?

The boasting buffoons claim to know about Life when they do not even have a clue of their history, yes, even about history you have been fed at best half truths but lots of lies.

What else have you been fed and you accepted as truth just because you had to spend a lot of money to receive it?

There is more, much more in many fields of knowledge, that need to be re-evaluated if not trashed altogether. It takes curiosity, courage to always challenge our own beliefs, open mindedness, and most importantly silence… yes, silence… in that silence geniuses in every field found the answer they were looking for or their best symphony and so many more example I could give.

Many philosophical, religious and scientific 'earthquakes' are about to shake all false beliefs and illusions away.

Tomorrow's scientists and priests will be indistinguishable from each other, as it was in ancient times.

Dear Mr. Towe,

You emphasize the only thing I write that I specifically stated is NOT even important for my 'point'.

I also clearly said that there are way more prepared people, from your same background, that can answer to those details. For me personally, even the Cambrian explosion by itself dismantles the whole house of cards of Darwin's own words.

I never looked deep in the study of fossils because I thought in my younger years like most other people, that if scientists said it then it MUST be true. I had to dig by myself, once I realized, also by my own research that what I was told did not make sense anymore. Not just that, I also saw there was a huge uninterrupted line of accredited scientists in every field, including surgeons, since way back to Darwin's publication of the 'theory' that opposed strongly the evolutionary hypothesis.

SOME examples are Louis Pasteur, George Washington Carver, Gregory Mendel, James Joule, Warner von Braun, Joseph Lister not to mention the thousands after those and the contemporary one that are easy searchable on the internet nowadays that are bringing forward 'issues' of the evolutionary story not even known when the 'older' opposition was set aside by the 'winning club' or cult.

Five years after Darwin's publication 717 scientists, including 86 Fellows of the Royal Society in London, signed “The Declaration of Students of the Natural and Physical Sciences” in direct response to Darwinism. These aren't people you can just dismiss that 'they do not know' as you did to me.

Also, “Physicians and Surgeons Who Dissent from Darwinism” was created in 2006 and currently has almost 900 signers from 17 countries.

And that's a PARTIAL list. Do not think that all the 'dissenters' end here.

My point is that, at best, there is NOT CONCLUSIVE evidence from either party. SO why students (and so the whole world) have to BE FORCED to hear just ONE VERSION from one 'party' ONLY! That’s all I am saying. Why not open at least to the POSSIBILITY that life as we know it, MAY have an 'intelligent origin' and not as stated by the 'know it all self appointed gods of today' , that we originated from lucky and random events by events not even understood by science?!! At least until there is a definite proof?!

And IF that is so, why wouldn't this intelligence give a very specific 'direction' within certain boundaries for the innumerable species? MAYBE dictated in form of a mathematical structure?

What is happening is a CULT like behavior on the likes of the worse Church examples and this has NOTHING to do with REAL, OPENMINDED, NOT FEARFUL of challenges, SCIENCE.

WHY don't we have 'controversial' lists such as the ones above against other scientific fields, like structural engineers for example? Because there is NOT controversy about mathematical and PROVEN beyond any doubts results.

That isn't the case for evolution!

Classical… :)

I am not worried at all

Sometimes I just get a bit infuriated for all the damage half truths or total lies have done and still do to this world, to its people.

Science, unfortunately, has made Divine Beings believe they are just sophisticated machines.

Maybe months or perhaps few short years but the 'house of cards' is surely about to hit the ground…

I appreciate your attempt to help, but I really do not need advice… everything is following its course, as precisely as a mathematical matrix.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,

Than are dreamt of in your philosophy."

Hamlet - William Shakespeare

Is it an issue for you my use of the term Divine Beings?

Are you a theologian for making a semantics issue of the meaning I associate to it? I could understand if a 'theologian' had issue with it… or maybe some religious person with a different belief, but you?

What difference does it make to you which arrogantly STATE, from your self-supplied pedestal, that you know FOR SURE that we are just evolved machines caused by an explosion of gas and dirt!

Or maybe you being the 'all knowing' you can tell us a bit about the evolution of consciousness or what is the 'spark' or moment that first consciousness and then self-awareness arose??

Then enlighten us, can you explain for example the 'sudden SAVANT syndrome'?? Or maybe you think some other scientist hiding somewhere has any clue of what's happening??

How about the innumerable other STILL unexplained 'MYSTERIES' of consciousness?? Do you need a list?

Just ONE example of hundreds possible. Explain, in light of your evolutionary assumption, the INSTANTANEOUS and PHYSIOLOGICAL changes in multi-personality disorder cases, where for example one second before the body is having a strong allergic reaction of some sort with one 'personality' and one second later the new 'personality' is INSTANTANEOUS CURED! Never mind that the third doesn’t even know the first two existed and has completely different physiological chart??

Before you spit out theories that you want to FORCE on to others with no freedom to have a different understanding of the SAME data, PROVE what you state! Explain to us the innumerable smaller 'DETAILS' about life before you appoint yourself as god and impose on everyone else your BELIEFS about WHAT LIFE and CONSCIOUSNESS IS!

Our article published in peer-reviewed Journal "Communicative & Integrative Biology". A few major points discussed in the paper:

(1) Brain is not the source of consciousness.

(2) Consciousness is ubiquitous in all living organisms, starting from bacteria to human beings.

(3) The individual cells in the multicellular organisms are also individually cognitive entities.

(4) Proposals like “artificial life”, “artificial intelligence”, “sentient machines” and so on are only fairytales because no designer can produce an artifact with the properties like internal teleology (Naturzweck) and formative force (bildende Kraft).

(5) The material origin of life and objective evolution are only misconceptions that biologists must overcome.

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138

One more thread that Bhakti is spamming with his non-peer reviewed "Opinion Article".

Aren't there enough people in airports for you to annoy?