Dear Collegues
I want to learn about different research designs. So that I could choose the most appropriate design. The sample college has around hundred faculties and 35ooo students. They have the intervention of quality assurance and accreditation for last seven years.
Regards
Krishna
Krishna:
Here's what is available in RG that can be helpful for you: https://www.researchgate.net/search.Search.html?type=publication&query=measuring%20the%20impact%20of%20quality%20assurance%20and%20accreditation%20on%20research%20trend%20in%20a%20small%20university
Universities are increasingly becoming internationally and culturally diverse, so one measure of quality would be a curriculum that is responsive to such diversity. When I did my PhD research, international students felt they were "invisible" in our programme content for the various courses. I have a few articles published on the latter so this issue is not overlooked in quality assurance and accreditation exercises at universities:
Data Generation I: International and invisible in a workforce edu...
Data Curriculum Inclusiveness Challenge: Responding to Multicultu...
Article Workforce Education and Development (WED): Graduate Students...
Best regards,
Debra
Research design specifies what group(s) for which data will be collected, to which group(s) and when the intervention will occur, and when the data will collected from each group. The strength of a design, and the possible biases inherent in a design, depend on the type of questions being addressed in the research.
Agree with Dr. Haitham in terms of exactly defining what you seek. However, there are many dimensions from which you may extract data and build a background from which you may start. Research productivity versus clear policies (quality assurance) versus university strategy... Data is easily collected from all three dimensions (for example), and then you may use a Mix Method to test whatever hypotheses that fit the subject in your mind.
There are many possibilities in any research study, but it all depends on research aims and objectives. I suggest a pragmatic research design ( mixed methods design) and then a further studies into a longitudinal study (5-9 years).
considero que la evaluación de impacto es un enfoque ideal para ese tipo de estudio asi como la investigación evaluativa longitudinal de seguimiento de procesos. por ejemplo si deseamos conocer si la evaluación institucional de una universidad ha ayudado aumentar la producción científica de la misma.
I believe hat generally, Qualitative should be employed with specific research approach like case study
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Psychology
- Mental Processes
- Learning