Hello,
This is the subject of my article: "Measles vaccination: a safe and effective approach to preventing measles and its complications, the case of the Uvira health zone, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo".
I'd like to understand why we recorded over 150 deaths and more than 2,000 cases in last year's measles epidemic at a time when routine immunization coverage is still over 95%.
Are children vaccinated against measles less likely to contract measles or develop fewer complications than unvaccinated children?
In my experience, routine vaccination coverage is always over 95%, but despite this, we still record many deaths due to complications.
I'd like to do a retrospective study of measles cases, but I'm wondering whether a long-term prospective study wouldn't be better...
Thank you very much for your input and advice
Israel