Ideological preferences from the right moving to center-left, lack of political representation, high levels of corruption, lack of rule of law and poor efficiency and effectiveness concerning public policies
Leonidas, thank you so much for your comments. Its true what you say and share your opinion. What happens in Mexico is that it not only the government´s party but also the party that governed Mexico during 2000-2012, a conservative party. In this span of time, poverty has grown from 42 % to 63 % of the population, So, as you can see, in this circumstances, a charismatic leader, "populist" says the propaganda, has a very high electoral preference: from a 23 % preference, it has gone up to over 50 %. The message has been Lopez Obrador is a "danger" to economic stability, investment, education... Chavez and Maduro are the objects of analogy.
And yet, the propaganda of fear has not had the expected effect as can be seen in the grafics.
Thank you so much, again.
The electoral results of July first show that fear propaganda in this election did have any effect. It is important to remember that reception conditions differed greatly in 2018 with regard to 2012 and 2006, speaking only from the perspective of discourse analysis; second, socioeconomic conditions also differ greatly; third, social reds have played an important role; insecurity has increased greatly, including the electoral period.
Dear Adrian Sergio Gimate-Welsh ... Good question... Actually I lived such similar case... almost similar...
Thanks for sharing all of these data..
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science
- Computer Communications (Networks)
- Internet