As a result of communication with the WG participants, I came to the conclusion:
The lack of direct contact, complete freedom of expression leads to the fact that very often participants begin to humiliate, insult those who do not agree with their point of view.
Many adhere to a simple philosophy: there may be many opinions, ideas and guesses, but the correct one is only mine !!!
What is your experience and what is your impression of the WG correspondence?
For many authors of original ideas, in my opinion, the factual presentation of their idea, painful perception of criticism from the participants and especially responses to criticism in their address with increased aggressive rhetoric are characteristic in the responses. This may mean that many RG users do not have sufficient cultural discussion skills.
I wonder what percentage, in your opinion, are: well-mannered, neutral and aggressive participants?
Fear the goat in front, the horse in the back, the fool from all sides!
And what's wrong with the fact that there are fools around, and you are smart? You surpass the crowd, rely on personal judgments, have your own opinion.
M. Zhvanetsky
According to the conclusions of Zhvanetsky, an intelligent person never argues, because everyone has their own truth. He does not burden anyone with his problems, because he avoids them and is ashamed to admit that they exist. And, finally, an intelligent person never reproaches his interlocutor for anything, does not ridicule his shortcomings, does not criticize and does not give value judgments to other people's actions.
Are there such people among your interlocutors?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Psychology
- Attitude