I would like to pay your attention that there are some information missed to answer your question quantitatively. The terms in your equation must be defined thoroughly. Your wireless communication system must be described in sufficient detail. For example what is R?. you ask about gamma and you said that that is a function of bit error rate.
In addition i could not get a copy of the referenced paper such that i could get the details of the problem.
In calculating the bit rate one starts from the Shannon capacity limit of a communication channel, that is
rb= B log2 (1+ sinr),
If the system is a spatial multiplexing mimo system with number of antennas N=Nt=Nr for the transmission and reception , then the bit rte will be increased by a factor N so that rb for mimo= N B log2 (1+ sinr), Here rb is the error free rate,
On the other side one can express the bit error rate as a function of sinr and the modulation order M. These expression can be readily found in the literature for the M-PSK and M-QAM.
At the end one can determine the spectral efficiency as a function of bit error rate and the modulation order.
This just an approach to solve the problem rather tan a rigorous answer.
I would like to pay your attention that there are some information missed to answer your question quantitatively. The terms in your equation must be defined thoroughly. Your wireless communication system must be described in sufficient detail. For example what is R?. you ask about gamma and you said that that is a function of bit error rate.
In addition i could not get a copy of the referenced paper such that i could get the details of the problem.
In calculating the bit rate one starts from the Shannon capacity limit of a communication channel, that is
rb= B log2 (1+ sinr),
If the system is a spatial multiplexing mimo system with number of antennas N=Nt=Nr for the transmission and reception , then the bit rte will be increased by a factor N so that rb for mimo= N B log2 (1+ sinr), Here rb is the error free rate,
On the other side one can express the bit error rate as a function of sinr and the modulation order M. These expression can be readily found in the literature for the M-PSK and M-QAM.
At the end one can determine the spectral efficiency as a function of bit error rate and the modulation order.
This just an approach to solve the problem rather tan a rigorous answer.
Thank you for the source. Now your question became clear. But before giving an answer i would like to pay your attention to the error in the equation: In the reference, it is log2 and not log10. So, the things return to its origin.
Let us start with Shannon again: rb= B log2 (1+ sinr),
In your equation the bit rate rb is substituted by the rate of the physical resource blocks r prb multiplied by the number of bits in one PRB which is termed R in your equation above. B is the total bandwidth of the channel as usual.
The problem with Shannon is that it is a theoretical limit of the channel capacity. It is higher than real rate since Shannon assumed infinite number of symbols while in the real systems the number of symbols M is limited. For M-PSK the number of bits per symbol n= log2M. In the real communication systems, the bit error rate Pe depends on the ratio of the signal to interference plus noise.
So, one has to modify Shannon to reflect the performance of the real communication channel. This is accomplished by dividing sinr by the constant gamma. It is so that one calculates the sinr required for certain bit error rate defined by the quality of the service say Pe= 10^-6 for certian modulation order and type.
If one substitutes this value directly into Shannon, one would get a much larger theoretical bit rate for the same channel bandwidth. So, one has to scale sinr by an empirical constant GAMMA such that one gets the real bit rate when substituting the real sinr.
P.S. to discussion. SNR in Shannon's formula for the capacity is SNR at the output of the channel (C.Shannon, Mathematical theory of communications, sect. 25).
Distance between the transmitter and receiver decreases SNR.
Do we correctly evaluate (or call) the capacity using SNR at the channel input, but not output?
I agree that SNR is a matrix associated with the channel, however the error probability is an end-to-end system matrix. Although the error in the destination depends on the the SNR received, but it also depends on the deciding rule, modulation scheme.
The sentence " the error probability is an end-to-end system matrix". To omit misunderstanding, let's confine a discussion by SISO systems. On the other hand, Shannon's formula depends on the modulation scheme implicitly, only on the received power. But the power depends on the distance. Just this is a question - what we call the channel capacity? Maximal bit rate at the channel output or input?
I do agree with you that Shannon's formula depends on the modulation scheme implicitly however when we talk about SNR I am of the view that the SNR is a channel dependent factor. For example, received SNR for two differently modulated signals if transmitted with same power (which generally happens) depends on the channel (yes i agree that channel response is function of distance) and not on the modulation. However, two differently modulated signal transmitted with same power may yield different error probabilities.
Dependence of bit rate on SINR is known and confirmed in practice. However no explicit relationships between the bit rate (also capacity) and BER exist. Therefore, the question of Afsaneh Saeidanezhad can be answered only in SINR part.
Nevertheless, bit rate and capacity should implicitly depend on BER. This is evident - each not corrected transmission error causes losses of information in the sequences of signals or bits (packages) delivered to addressee.
This creates the question in development of the question asked by Afsaneh: can influence of BER on the bit rate (or capacity) be evaluated in any way? Do we know?
This question is not abstract. For instance: if we use good correcting code (BER
Be careful. You asked question about the channel but did not define its model. There is a lot of models. Term "order"" may suggest you employ polinomial , AR - ARMA or other models.