The concept of criticism. Criticism defines a language as: between its good and its inferiority, its flaws and pros and cons. Criticism defines the term as the expression of an opinion or position in the perception of art through the literary taste of the textual and poetic texts, that is to distinguish them from one another. And there is criticism of the writers and poets, jurists and fundamentalists in matters of religion and jurisprudence, each has its own method of criticism; because the rules applied to the texts Damage to different kinds
The Critique of Literary : Criticism is the process of studying and issuing judgments on literary texts. It depends on the profound discussion of literary criticism methods and objectives. It is one of the literary arts in which the critic's taste and intellect are linked in an attempt to reveal the aesthetics of the literary text or the flaws that exist in it.
The main purpose of writing poetry is to express one of the topics that touch the human being in general, whether it is the subjects of everyday life or feelings and thoughts. Therefore, the choice of the poem should originate from within the poet. Some say that self-experience is what wins the poems weight and greater value Who write without actually experiencing the experience; poets express love, pride, or pain better than poems written for the purpose of praise, for example.
Although, the skills required to be a poet and the skills required to be a critic are distinct, but they're related, and to be a good poet one needs at least some of the skills of a good critic.
Criticism responds to poetry, analyses it and informs it of its own motivations, themes, styles, imaginations, ambience, influence and effect; in that it my eve overreach the poet. Criticism seeks to make poetry better and to ensure the poet reaches his goals. Both should be complementary. Critical skills however sharpen the skills and intellect of the poet, focuses the expressive skills of the poet better.
There is a difference between criticism and scholarship. Most criticism is setting up a value system that is not based on craft but on prescription (pun: remember, Aristotle was a biologist). Poetry comes from the Greek poesis, which means making. In other words, it is a craft. When most people call it an art, they mean that it is on a higher plane than craft whereas the term art refers to something artificial, or made by humans and not natural. Scholarship studies the history, the technique, the influences, the actual components, not the theoretical ones. For instance, most versification studies are not done by scholars but by "critics". They usually are not great scholars of the language, its history, its rhythms (standard language, variations, localisms) and most do not have experience, let alone competence, in other languages to be able to understand the concept of how to make rhythm work.
I write this as a researcher, student of history, looker for patterns and practicing writer of verse for over 60 years, a PhD in British Renaissance Rhetoric and Literature and an M.A. and B.A. in Theatre Arts. I have acted and written over 200 plays as well as my verse and my essays.I taught composition on the college level and wound up doing research and data entry for law firms, becoming the lead in my area, refusing to use jargon and expecting to hear and be heard in common speech so that there was no information assumed in the communication and, hence, missed. The people who understood me were the IT people; they understood what I was doing whereas the attorneys only understood that I was right.
If you can't tell, I studied Cicero in high school and can still recite him by heart. I have acquired knowledge of Hebrew, Classical Greek, Italian, French, German, Czech and Russian in various degrees of proficiency since they were either poorly taught for non-speakers or else actually finding them taught at institutions I could attend was no longer possible in our current American educational system and has not been for some time. I wrote this in the mid-1970, being told I wrote too well ever to be commercial (because I would not follow whatever the current fads in philosophy and "art" were):
Perhaps my hopes lie in the future;
Perhaps my loves lie in the past:
I who live today am muter
Than the stones Praxitiles cast.
First one is creative and the other is in most cases opposite to the first one.
His approach to writing poetry criticism: Kdama starts from his definition of poetry to limit the primary elements that make up poetry: the word, weight, rhyme and meaning and he sees that poetry - like any other industry - it has two extremes; the extremity is quality, Here comes the mediation between quality and inferiority. When the definition of hair is defined, these elements are considered in a purely formal way, determining the qualities to which the hair reaches the highest quality, and then identifying the defects that fall to the lowest degree of mediocrity.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Writing