I'm a little shocked at the answers Murugesh received.
Let's talk of WEDM and the best Ra values. Whence such values as 0.8 µm to come; or 3 µm; or µm?
Of course I can reach such values, if I let a strong influence on surface and through lead wire EDM with pulse durations of 20 to 200 µs.
First of all it must be clarified what kind of material to be cut. The next question is what Ra values are to be achieved. Can the machining with a main section made or must be re-cuts.
With reputable WEDM equipment you should come without problems less than 1 µm (Ra) in a productive main section. Today, it is also not a problem with a main section under 0.5 microns (Ra) to come. With appropriate after cuts Ra values are 0.2 µm feasible.
Basically, we need to re-discuss with the W-EDM of hard metals and ceramics.
Pure tungsten samples we have not wire-cut, ie since the optimal parameters have to be found by you. With deionized water I would suspect that tungsten oxide forms, electrolytic effects play a role in more detail and it should be noted that wire is used.
What are the suggestions for achieving Ra < 0.4 microns? In order to have an inclination of 5o over a length of 30mm path length and thickness of 50mm .
As Daniel Martinez Krahmer ·mentioned I was able to achieve 1.6 to 2microns with Ontime 1 microsecond and 46micro seconds off time.
Can I expect someone for further explanation regarding this?
What is the recommended cut-off length for measuring the wire-cut machined surface? is 0.8 mm ok? With 0.8 mm cut-off length, i obtained values up to 6.0 micron. Is it normal?
The range of Roughness depends upon the machining parameters and, work materials as well as electrode wire in WEDM. You can find the suitable range as per trial runs for your work material.