Dear Colleagues,

it is interesting to observe the different Shari'ah screening methodologies applied by many Islamic index providers. Some use Total Assets in the denominator others Market Capitalization (e.g. Dow Jones, S&P, AAOIFI) in their financial ratios (e.g. leverage ratio). Some use 30% others use 33% as a threshold criterion for max. debt level (Meezan Index uses 37%). Examples:

·       Total Debt/Total Assets < 33%

·       Total Debt/Market Capitalization < 30%

This is a long-lasting debate among scholars, however, NON of the academic research papers and NON of the Islamic index provider provide the rationale behind these screening ratios.

I would like to highlight the importance here in regards to the judgement that have been made. In specific, companies are classified either being Shari’ah compliant or non-compliant, with the former being halal (permissible) to invest in and latter haram (impermissible) to invest in for the Muslim investors. Any classification between haram/halal must be justified and backed-up with the Islamic sources, the Qur’an, Sunnah and by the respective Ijtihad (Islamic reasoning).

From an Islamic perspective, Muslim investors have the right and are even urged to question about the rationale behind these screening criterion. Consequently, I want to trigger some brainstorming-functions with the following questions:

  • What is the (Islamic) rationale behind the use of interest-bearing DEBT (only) in the numerator of the leverage ratio?
  • What is the (Islamic) rationale behind the use of Total Assets / Market Capitalization in the denominator?
  • What is the rationale behind these different threshold criterion - ranging from 30%-37%?
  • Note: The application of Market Capitalization in the denominator (Question 2) is heavily criticized and it is argued that Market Capitalization is more volatile than Total Assets, hence it can cause a company being screened and classified as Shari’ah compliant according to one Index provider and non-compliant according to another Index provider.

    This argument favors the use of Total Assets; however, it is justified from the “Finance” Knowledge of Body and not from the “Islamic” Knowledge of Body.

    Thank you.

    More Ramazan Yildirim's questions See All
    Similar questions and discussions