Obviously, it is impossible to use continuous reinforcement concrete bars; thus, several splicing methods are available to tackle the problem. Among them, overlap with tie wire, coupling, and welding methods are the common ones.

The question that has been on my mind is: What is the force transmission mechanism difference between these methods?

In the overlap splicing method, there is inherent space between the center of the bars. It means that there is a discontinuity in force transmission in this method. On the other hand, in mechanical splicing (coupling), the rebars' center is in precisely the same direction. Several tensile tests in this method have shown us that the rupture will never happen in place of the patch (beneath the coupling). While in the overlap splicing method, a fracture could occur anywhere along the rebar.

The question is that, has the force transmission mechanism taken into account for splicing rebars? Or overlap splicing method exists just to keep the rebars in their place for concreting?

Because the mentioned methods are acting quite differently in terms of the force transmission mechanism.

Thank you so much for your attention and participation.

More Mehran Shahpari's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions