17 February 2015 17 4K Report

Synthetic biology, synbio for short, is an emerging interdisciplinary field that in an essence attempts to bring engineering principles into biology. Nontheless the idea of engineering biological systems has been often confused with what has already been done in other areas of biotechnology such as metabolic engineering and genetic engineering, and this has been one of the major reasons of why synthetic biology is hard to define, even by leading experts in the field.

I know that the main difference between synbio and GE is the use of new foundational tools ( asides from those already used in Genetic engineering like recombinant DNA technology )  that have upgraded the potential of GE.This new tools such as DNA synthesis, the use of Standards and Abstraction have helped the development of synbio.(This idea is explained by Drew endy in these video :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIuh7KDRzLk)

But here comes my  real question: Is the use of these 3 foundational tools (standards,DNA synthesis ,abstraction)  necessary for a project to be considered Synthetic biology? 

In other words a project that contains the use of DNA Synthesis , but doesn't use standards (i.e. biobricks ..) or abstraction would be considered "genetic engineering" or synthetic biology? 

i Personally think that the use of these 3 things is essential for it to be considered synbio , but i am no expert so i would like to know because I am writing an article for a school journal and i would like to explain it properly. thank you 

More Uriel Barboza's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions