Participants were presented with 32 images per category. However, some trials were lost due to artifacts. Though most of the time the valid trials hover around 30, the minimum number of trials in a particular category was 13 which seems very low. In addition, the number of trials in one category is significantly lower than the trials in the other two categories. What is the best practice for dealing with this issue? Should individuals with low trials be excluded from analysis? If so, how should the cut off be determined? 

Similar questions and discussions