Why you are saying Avicennia and Rhizophora are closest taxa. Morphologically they are so different and come under two widely separated groups and families. Rhizophora is polypetalous whereas Avicennia is a gamopetalous. Rhizophora has true viviparous germination where as Avicennia it is usually crypto-vivipary and so many other characters.
There is a great diversity in mangrove species. At least about 110 species are recognized as mangrove plant species growing in saline habitats belonging to about 19 families and 17 of them to Rhizophoraceae. No single character is found common in all mangrove species. They are typically trees or large shrubs.
As Dr. Nair told Avicennia and Rhizophora are distint taxa. The former is categorised as black mangrove and the latter red mangrove.
Morphologically Rhizophora spp. can be distinguished from Avicennia by means of pneumatophore and cryptovivipary present in Avicennia spp. but in Rhizophora spp. having stilt root and true vivipary and I agree with Mohanan sir regarding floral morphology and really these are not closest taxa.