We assume that the Bohr/Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics and entanglement phenomena is true except that A. Einstein was remarkable and has the right vision.
The entanglement or action at a distance has a limited speed that does not exceed the speed of light c.
It can't be a scary action from a distance.
Moreover, we assume that Einstein's objection can be simply verified by Cairo's theory of numerical techniques or any other adequate statistical theory.
Entanglement doesn’t have a speed because it refers to phase space, the space of states, not spacetime.
What can be interpreted as Copenhagen interpretation depends a lot on the historic stage.
Right in the early days when Bohr was trying out his model at some conference, disputing with Einstein.?
Or at a later stage, when Eistein already settled on the statistical interpretation after Born?
I dont think we are that worried with interpretation, but if something should be missing from QM itself.
Agree, nothing that obvious seems missing
- Badges
- Science topic