Dear @Vincent I agree that innovation has abroad definition. This can be seen in our different work on the subject over the years:

Conference Paper Best Practice in Establish Spirit of Innovation in Scientifi...

Article Creating Innovation Policies that Leads to Positive Future S...

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333973240_Social_Innovation_and_Sustainable_Entrepreneurship

Article Geographic Influence on Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spillovers

these are only examples ..

Regards

Mohamed

Dear Mohamed, I will read your material this weekend. thanks for your contribution. Maybe you can share the main points of your argument, also for others interested in this discussion

vincent

That´s a very interesting matter! I will read your paper in detail in the next days and provide a feed back. Maybe your approach leads to new insights into the field of social innovations, many greetings, Axel

Innovation is a new/novel product or services or process that already enter the market. Its different from invention, an invention is a new/novel product or services or process that not yet enter the market. The different is the market, an innovation must already enter the market. The term 'new' can be applied locally or globally. For example maybe an innovation is not new to the rest of the word but it new to a particular organization/manufacturer, and it still can be acknowledge as an innovation to the particular organization/manufacturer

Dear Sigit Setiawan, Thanks for your contribution. What is interesting is that your answer is precisely what I thought before I started to think about these matters. in this respect, it would be great if you were able to read my article and provide me some feedback. on the one hand, I can imagine that the article opens up some of you initial ideas and assumptions. on the other, as you are a great scholar in your discipline, I hope you can also challenge my initial thoughts.

Dear Vincent Blok , I will read it, and comment it after I read it carefully. Thank you for sharing an interesting paper.

Dear Vincent

I must congratulate you for your work on the philosophical grounds of innovation. Could you mail me your article so that I can give you some feedback on the issue.

In view of the above, there are many definitions of innovation. This is due to different standards adopted by various organizations, institutions, enterprises, etc. to identify whether something is innovative and in the context of the possibility of applying potential innovations, new technological, process, production, marketing, logistic, organizational, product solutions, etc. as new, economically effective, acceptable to citizens, in line with the expectations of consumers and contractors, etc.

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

If you will allow colleagues to philosophize, then I see one "crossroads" on which there is a split discussion.

The first argument is the basis for the development of the society laid down criteria development by type: improvement (deterioration) decline (increase), rising (falling) profit (loss), etc.

And when one inventor creates through such a comparative method of creation (development of thoughts or ideas) product principle: see - repeat - improve, I think before us is - Novation.

But when this already existing innovation has obvious and new signs of improving the quality properties of the object (modernization, change in numerically measured properties), then we have an Innovation.

When a genius creates an invention, then there is a case-God prompted.

Creation (invention) made without signs of rationality or optimality, as well as improvement or modernization of the properties of the object-is an Invention. Thanks ...

"There will be wings! If I don't do it, someone else will do it for me." Leonardo da Vinci.