In classifying countries and cultures as 'developed' and 'developing' and 'under developed', the criteria used is often economic. Is development widely misconstrued as 'material' development? After treading the path of 'Industrial revolution' and the path of materialism, societies have realised the hard way that these dont bring happiness as expected. Some have explored the hedonistic path and met with boredom, drugs, unhappiness, disenchantment with life, and suicide. Is material development then the right parameter? Bhutan has the Happiness Index where instead of economic criteria, happiness is used to measure development. Is something similar needed for the so called 'developed' countries?

In pictures of children across the world, 'poor' children from 'developing and under developed ' countries come across as more happy and smile genuinely in spite of the lack of 'material infrastructure and development'.. While 'poor' children from developed economies appear genuinely unhappy. Therefore as adults, is our perception of rich and poor, developed and undeveloped, have and have-nots, totally misplaced? Is our perception of rich and poor and 'material happiness' acquired later on as adults?

Do we need a new paradigm of 'development' and 'happiness' towards which one can genuinely strive and achieve instead of being sold cheap materialistic 'pipe dreams' ?

More Raveendra Nath Yasarapu's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions