The interpretation of results will involve assessing the overall effect size, evaluating confidence intervals, and determining the clinical significance of the findings in relation to oral health outcomes among school-aged populations.
Yirsaw, A.N., Bogale, E.K., Tefera, M., Belay, M.A., Alemu, A.T., Bogale, S.K., Getachew, E., Andarge, G.A., Seid, K. and Lakew, G., 2024. Prevalence of dental caries and associated factors among primary school children in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC oral health, 24(1), p.774.
For "Oral health promotion intervention in school setting" which toll will you consider? If I am at same page to get you, I share my view here.
Take overall effect size and clinical significant.
Aim of promotional intervention is improve the health status, make people habituate to healthy practices and prevent health problem. If you wants to hit the aim, you need to know the clinical significant and effective size to develop an effective intervention.
In intervention, when you mention your recommended practice, the clinical significant and size will give you a strong base. Rest are same.
That's from my end. Hope it will act as scope of further thinking.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Science
- Media
- Journalism