Hello!

I think that:

• ->Development economicsvocational training for adult and adolescents) and on social programs - such as improving health, vaccinations and prophylaxis, which in turn result in more healthy population, which (paradoxically) reduces costs of health in the overall country budget (due to better Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALY)- people are healthier, live longer (and thus can work longer) and when they retire because they are old, but are healthy, they will costs the state financial system much less than if they were old and sick or even throughoutly disabled). Later, better economic conditions will result in people buying better, and therefore costlier goods and amenities (more taxes for the state) and will also increase demand on better housing. At that point, private domestic investors should afford such investment without the help of the state. Thus increasing demand on another types of goods and hiring more workers, who spend their money-> now, in the country there is an economic boom- state is more rich and can afford on better public projects (for example on total development economics project which provide proper housing, sanitation, amenities and proper health, social and educational services for the whole population of the state, thus boosting the aforementioned country's economic boom. Now, the reasonable state will make sure to make an improvement on raw materials industry (mining, agriculture, forestry)- by enacting a ban (or at least heavy limitations) on exports of raw materials from the country (the state can now do it even by force (due to having more bargaining power thanks to economic boom and improved financial situation to withstand possible backlash and / or make a public investment if there is one needed in making given raw material at least partially processed status or even semi-finished product). Now, even more reasonable state will enact strong and radical family planning (birth control) edicts, forcefully reducing the fertility of the population, in order to avoid a situation, where there will be a youth bulge (due to greater fertility and less infant mortality (thanks to improvements in housing, sanitation, food supply and better health services)- so many young people that the state's economy will be unable to give employment to them all, thus provoking an appearance of high youth unemployment, which the state will be forced to take care of. And that case is not so easy- the state cannot just kill the surplus youth, so it would be forced to give them welfare support (which will cost a lot). Then, those young people, due to boredom and lack of purpose, will fall into drugs and then into violent crime, and due to the sheer numbers of them thus severely deteriorate the public order and safety, which in turn will severely hamper further economic growth, social mobility and foreign investment and tourism. In order to combat this, the state will be forced to invest a lot of resources into security services (police etc.), which will lead to even more violence and even worse situation and quickly what was achieved with such a beautiful plan and commitment of whole population will be lost.

I hope that my little screed will help you with your assignment :)

Best Regards,

Tomasz Wojciechowski

1 votes 0 thanks

Okay, thank you