I think, we can have "genuine" democracy, "effective" democracy, and other kinds of democracy, as well as we can have "fascist" totalitarianism, "communist" totalitarianism and - more important nowadays - "digital totalitarianism". All are totalitarianisms and bad for mental and physical health, discriminating. What is more important, dear Jean-Paul Gagnon, is that "digital totalitarianism" thrives under liberal or neoliberal democracies too. Can You explain that? And who can explain that? Please, waiting for the argumented answers.

What’s important is not wasting time to labelling what kind of democracies it is or types of totalitarianism, but the main issue most concerning human being is striving for rule of law, equality, social justice, forming fair and effective institutions. If humans are able to create a just society which can guarantees human life, respecting human dignity and freedom, able to provide fair opportunity for everyone in searching education, getting jobs and so on is the fundamental issue. It doesn't matter what the bluffers call it.

The question of how to distinguish between "real" and "fake" democracy without a universal concept of what democracy is, is a complex and controversial topic. Some scholars argue that there is no singular definition of democracy and that different models of democracy can be evaluated based on their ability to meet certain criteria, such as the protection of individual rights, the rule of law, and the ability of citizens to participate in the political process.

One approach to identifying and distinguishing between different types of democracy is to use a multidimensional framework that considers different aspects of democracy, such as electoral process, civil liberties, and political representation. This allows for the identification of different types of democracy, such as liberal democracy, participatory democracy, and deliberative democracy, and the evaluation of each type based on how well it meets certain criteria.

Another approach is to use a comparative method, comparing different countries or regions to each other and identifying patterns and variations in democratic practices and institutions. This can help to identify different models of democracy and to evaluate how well they are functioning in practice.

It's also important to note that in addition to these methods, there are also other elements that can be considered when distinguishing between "real" and "fake" democracy, such as the presence of democratic institutions and processes, the protection of human rights, and the level of public engagement and participation.

In conclusion, while there may not be a universal concept of democracy, there are different approaches to identifying and distinguishing between different types of democracy and evaluating their effectiveness. These include using multidimensional frameworks and comparative methods, as well as considering factors such as democratic institutions, human rights, and public engagement.

It is important to recognize that there is no single, universal definition of democracy. Different people, cultures, and countries can have different conceptions of what democracy means to them. Therefore, it is not possible to definitively determine what is “real” democracy and what is “fake” democracy. Instead, we must take a variety of perspectives into account when evaluating and understanding democracy. We should consider the historical, cultural, and political context of a particular democracy, as well as the principles and values that underlie it. We should look at the institutional structures and processes that give shape to a particular democracy, as well as the rights and freedoms it offers its citizens. We should also consider the extent to which a particular democracy is inclusive and participatory, as well as how it deals with dissent and disagreement. Ultimately, it is up to individuals and societies to decide what kind of democracy they want. What is “real” democracy for one person may be “fake” democracy for another. Therefore, it is important to approach the concept of democracy with an open mind and an appreciation for the variety of perspectives that exist.

The concept of democracy is complex and has been defined in various ways. According to Arvydas Guogis from Mykolas Romeris University, we can have “genuine” democracy, “effective” democracy, and other kinds of democracy.