Proponents of gun pocession by citizens claim that it is a neceseccity otherwise it distorts the strong atomism they support, the one that such pocession is a right with political implications (defend from corrupted government).
A majority of these proponents have controversial claims about other civil issues such as IDs necessity, for example.
They might believe that IDs are bad because they make you a number, register your life's dealts etc.
But it has functional roles. How can you be identified as the claimant to a bank if the banker is not a close acquitance?
2 strong arguments agaist popular non hunting gun pocession
People that are proponents of free guns for self Defence right and Defence from corrupted government seizing their state fail to ask important questions. What is the role of police? With regards to corrupted governs there is press power, anti corruption ngo's, institutions to monitor. How can one miss such a big corruption for long enough? One who still holds these arguments in low regard is either is not literate enough of moderncivil political orgamization or undermines its status and wellness of aims to the anarchic level..
Dear Dr. P. P. Afxenti , compare the quantity of murders per 100 thousand men in the USA with the quantity of murders per 100 thousand men in Sweden.
As an archaeologist, I can not see any period, or group, without weapons to either shoot at prey to eventually eat, or other hunters that do not stay on their own "turff". Naturally, I can be blind - but look back in time, and see you you find. The problem with our modern weapons is that they work to well.
Lou
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publication