Initially we can say that a review of the literature is important because without it, you will not acquire a comprehensive understanding of the topic, of what has already been done on it. What are the qualities of a good literature review ?
Literature Review is a type of review article.
Qualities of a good literature review are as follows:
1. The writer must follow the stipulated formatting style
2. It should define key term, terminology and definitions. it should also state the meaning of acronyms.
3. The sources must be relevant and authoritative
4.A good literature review shows signs of synthesis and understanding of the topic
Literature Review is a search and evaluation of the available literature in your given subject or chosen topic area.
The Qualities of Literature Review are:-
1. There should be strong evidence of analytical thinking shown through the connections you make between the literature being reviewed.
2. A good Literature Review is not simply a list describing or summarizing several articles, a literature review is discursive prose which proceeds to a conclusion by reason or argument
3. It strike a balance between sources supporting and opposing a particular aspect or particular subject of subject
4. Should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject
The literature review is a story that explains the background to the problem the researcher (the writer) is exploring, and makes clear why this problem holds either theoretical or practical significance. The literature review sets the context of the research problem for the reader. [ Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P.R. (1996).] From the literature review, the reader should understand why the particular research questions or hypotheses are addressed in the study, and how these research questions or hypotheses will expand knowledge in the given area.
some of the quality of literature review are as follows
1/ Relevance: This is a simple and easy to understand characteristic, but one that is often overlooked by writers. Anything cited in the literature review should be relevant to the study.
2/ Omissions: As a writer, one should take care to provide all points of view on a given topic. This does not mean that a writer must include in the review every study conducted on a given topic; rather, this means that one makes an honest attempt not to conceal points of view on a topic that may not support the writer's position. Honesty and integrity are important in research, and not all researchers share these human characteristics.
3/ Citations: Citations are the references a writer uses in the text.
4/Summary: This is typically a short paragraph or few sentences that summarize the literature review. In most written reports of research, the writer will provide a transition from literature review to research questions or hypotheses. The purpose of the transition is to help the reader see the connection between the literature review and the research questions or hypotheses. An example of a summary is provided below. The first two sentences provide the transition/summary.
In simple terms, a literature review can be defined as gathering relevant information on a particular subject of subject.
• It must strike a balance between sources supporting and opposing a particular aspect or argument
•It should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject
• It must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from your research
• It must be conducted from reliable sources- students must give books and journals the first priority when doing a literature review. In the event you they are using articles written by other researchers, the articles must be peer-reviewed.
• The writer must follow the stipulated formatting style.
• The sources must be relevant and authoritative.
• It should not necessarily be organized logically, organizing a literature based on the weight of points presented gives it more weight.
• It must clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework.
• It must identify studies and models that support your topic.
• It should define key term, terminology and definitions. It should also state the meaning of acronyms.
• It must lay a strong foundation for your research topic How to conduct a literature review.
• Scan through the abstract or introduction to check the mention of your topic.
• Evaluate the source for relevance and quality noting that a long list of sources does not necessarily translate to high quality literature review.
Literature review; is a review which shows the background for what you are investigating.
The following are the qualities of good literature review;
closely related and we'll focused on the problem or research through which your investigating.
2.
We can say A literature review shows signs of sythesis and qualties of a good understanding of the topic. It review strong evidence of analytical thinking shown through connection you make between the literature being reviewed. A good literature review should be organised as follows:
1.outline and sumarize
One should draft an outline for your review
Summarize the synthesis
2.organise your paper
There are different ways of organising
. chronologicaly
. thematicaly
. methodogicaly
3 state elements of literature review
. objective, state the purpose
. background, overview of research topic
. method, step by step on how you perform evaluation of material
. Body, contains the evaluation of material
. conclusion, summary of your analysis
. Bibliography list of papers you discuss and reference.
1.It must clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework.
2.A good literature review must conducted from reliable sources.
3.It must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from the research.
4.The sources must lay a strong foundation for the research topic.
Literature review;is a review which shows the background of the problem or research under which you are investigating.
The following are the qualities of literature review;
1)closely related and well focused on the problem or research which you are investigating.
2) Should be relevant with which you are investigating, so as to obtain accurate data.
3).It should be currently, in order to obtain data that will enable you to have current reference for your investigation.
4). Should be broad and comprehensive so as, you can have access for differents data.
The following are the qualities of a good literature review.
Rigorous
Research is a laborious and hard work in reality and it requires great patience and control. Research paper requires rigorousness to maintain its quality. There can be several factors that can effect the quality and the outcome of the research, the researcher should have a control over these factors. Some factors will effect the research positively while other factors can negatively effect the research. Negative factors can decrease the validity of the research, so these factors should be kept in control by the researcher.
Controlled
Another very important and basic characteristic of a research paper is that it should have to be controlled or measured. Everything that you add in a research paper is pre-planned and cannot happen just by chance. The first step in conducting a research is choosing a research topic, from that step till the end, writing the research paper the researcher should keep control over the research study. He should measure the consequences of each step that he has planned to take prior to taking it.
The second very important meaning of being controlled is that the researcher should be able to control the external factors from influencing the study. In quantitative studies it is easier to control the external factors. In qualitative studies as well the researcher should know how to control the factors that should not impact the results of the observation.
Accurate
Accuracy is important because without accuracy the research paper cannot be valid and generalizable. In every step of the research the researcher has to check the accuracy. When the researcher is reviewing literature he should write down the references along with the literature review so that when writing those reviews he can accurately write the reference of each review. While testing the hypothesis the researcher should write down the results of the tests accurately so that there is no error. In research the researcher should leave no chances of error by himself. He should ensure the accuracy of his research as much as possible. Accuracy adds to the reliability and replicability of the research
Clear
A research paper should have to be free of ambiguities and it should have great clarity. Clarity is one of the main essences of research and without clarity the research paper becomes difficult for the readers to understand. Clarity can be achieved through the use of right words, good grammar, academic writing style etc.
Concise
As a researcher you do not need to add a lot to the research paper to make it unique or interesting rather you should add only relevant and original content. The readers will be able to understand a concise research more easily, there should not be unnecessary details in the research. A research paper is bound by the number of words limit by the institution. The researcher should know how to divide that limit among various sections of the research paper.
Valid
Validity is the most important concern in writing and conducting a research. The actual strength of the research paper is its validity. A valid research is applicable to various situations in general or it can be applied to any specific situation, people or society. Validity and reliability both can be achieved by using various tools.
Verifiable
The data the researcher adds in the research paper should have to be verifiable and provable. The researcher should be able to demonstrate the research paper and there should not be any loopholes in the information.
Sequential
The research should have to be conducted and written in a logical manner. The researcher should follow a sequence so that he cannot get troubled in the end as to how to compile this research. It is better if you start writing the research paper as you are conducting it.
Precise
Preciseness means that the research paper should have completeness and it should contain detailed investigation of the research topic.
Coherent
Coherence is necessary because it makes the research paper a complete and one unit. Every part of the research paper should be so linked that it makes a whole.
Generalizable
The research paper findings should be generalizable and the findings should be applicable to the society in one way or other. Sometimes the purpose of the research is to develop new research tools, techniques or data collection instruments. Such research may not be useful for the society in general but in the long run researchers will be able to use these tools or techniques to conduct more researches.
(a)A good literature review will not only summarize the information, but also point out weakness in the experimental procedures as well as possible theoretical conflicts. (b) A good literature review is not simply a list describing or summarizing several articles, a literature review is discursive prose which proceed to conclusion by reason or argument. (C) A good literature review shows signs of synthesis and understanding of the topic. These should be strong evidence of analytical thinking shown through the literature being reviewed.
Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
Qualities of A Good Lit Review A good literature review shows signs of synthesis and understanding of the topic. There should be strong evidence of analytical thinking shown through the connections you make between the literature being reviewed.
In simple terms, aliterature reviewcan be defined as gathering relevant information on a particular subject of subject.•
It must strike a balance between sources supporting and opposing a particular aspect or argument•
It should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject•
It must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from your research• It must be conducted from reliable sources- students must give books and journals the first priority when doing a literature review. In the event you they are using articles written by other researchers, the articles must be peer-reviewed.• The writer must follow the stipulated formatting style• The sources must be relevant and authoritative•
It should not necessarily be organized logically, organizing a literature based on the weight of points presented gives it more weight.•
It must clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework•
It must identify studies and models that support your topic•
It should define key term, terminology and definitions. It should also state the meaning of acronyms.•
It must lay a strong foundation for your research topic How to conduct a literature review•
Scan through the abstract or introduction to check the mention of your topic.
• Evaluate the source for relevance and quality noting that a long list of sources does not necessarily translate to high quality literature review 📷
In simple terms, literature review can be defined as gathering relevant information on a particular subject of subject.
The following are the qualities of good literature review such as:-
.• It must strike a balance between sources supporting and opposing a particular aspect or argument
• It should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject
• It must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from your research
• It must be conducted from reliable sources- students must give books and journals the first priority when doing a literature review. In the event you they are using articles written by other researchers, the articles must be peer-reviewed
.• The writer must follow the stipulated formatting style
• The sources must be relevant and authoritative
• It should not necessarily be organized logically, organizing a literature based on the weight of points presented gives it more weight
.• It must clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework
• It must identify studies and models that support your topic
• It should define key term, terminology and definitions. It should also state the meaning of acronyms.
• It must lay a strong foundation for your research topicHow to conduct a literature review
• Scan through the abstract or introduction to check the mention of your topic.
• Evaluate the source for relevance and quality noting that a long list of sources does not necessarily translate to high quality literature review
• Confirm the availability of duplicated research
Literature review - Is a comprehensive summary of previous research on a topic. It should give a theoretical base for the research and help the author determine the nature of the research.
A good literature review have the following qualities:
1. It based on logical reasoning and involves both inductive and
deductive method. Data or knowledge that is derived is real time from actual observations in natural things.
2. It achieved the or similar results as the original study, It gives
greater validity to that those results can be generalized to the
larger population.
3. It have a process of collection, analyzing and interpreting
information to answer questions or solve problems. It
generates new questions or cyclical in nature.
4. A good literature review it can be incremental.
Literature review is the process of examining research that has been conducted in a particular flied of study. Is an act of selecting available documents and evaluate those documents in relation to the research being proposed.
Good literature review should posses the following qualities;
1) informative, a good literature review should inform to what is known inconsistences in body of knowledge in relation to the research being proposed.
2) should identify research problem and develop research question. The examined research should be able to identify research problem and develop research question for proposed research.
3) exploratory, a good literature review should be able to discover of unanswered questions about the subject, concepts or problems.
4) clearly expressed, a good literature review should describe the strength and weaknesses of design and methods of inquiry and instruments used in early research work.
5) comprehensive, should involve different study settings or different samples size and different study population and determine of the needs to replicate prior study.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Its a process of gathering relevant information on a particular subject .A good literature review shows signs of synthesis and understanding of the topic.There should be strong evidence of analytical thinking shown through the connections you make between the literature being reviewed.
The following are the qualities of a good literature review:-
A. proper grammar,spelling and punctuation
A good literature review ought to have proper grammar,spelling and punctuation.Since the exclamatory mark is used to indicate a strong response or command,it should be avoided.This will somewhat make the review seem unbiased since there will be no special indication of contempt.The author should engage himself in peer reading,where his suggestions,also make corrections.
B. Effective content.
A good literature review should have an effective content.As the author of a literature review,you must become familiar with a large amount of research on that specific topic.The literature review should be easy for the reader to follow.The words used should be precisely chosen to suit the audience of the review.For instance,if the review regards to business studies and is intended for business studies and intended for business students,the use of scientific words should be avoided.
C. Widely and narrow
A good literature review it should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject.Also its must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from your research.
The qualities of a good literature review.
1. The good literature review must be clearly address the researcher question and the theoretical framework.
2. Another qualities of good literature review it should not be necessarily to be recognized logically, organizing a literature based on the weight of points presented that can gives it more weight.
3. The good literature r
eview should strike a balance between sources supporting and gathering relevant information on a particular subject.
4. Also a good literature review must identify studies and models that should support the topic that you are going to do.
5. Must lay a strong foundation for your research topic from relevant and quality noting.
Literature Review can be defined as gathering relevant information on a particular subject of a subject.
Quality of good literature review
1.It should be wide enough to cover or to provide enough information required on your topic
2. It must identify studies and models that support your topic
3.It must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from your research
4. It must lay a strong foundation for your topic
5.It should state the meaning of acronyms and defining the keyterm and terminology
6.The source must be relevant and authoritative.
1.Consider your audience. Are you engaging with specialists in one discipline?
2.avoid jargon and strive for "plain English."
When writing for a very specialized audience, consider using "plain English" anyway.
3.Short paragraphs are easier to read than long paragraphs.
4.Subheadings and subsections can help to underscore the structure of your review.
5.Do more than just summarize the readings. A lit review is not an annotated bibliography.
6.Resist the temptation to refer to *all* the readings you've evaluated.
Tell the reader how the literature intersects with your project -- how your project complements the existing literature.
7.Be objective.
Literature review is the process of reading , writing what has other researchers written in their work or study . OR
is the comprehensive summary of previous research topic.
QUALITIES OF GOOD RESEARCH REVIEW.
A good introduction of the research: this convince the reader to continue to read
your work because its introduced the reader to need more what this study is explain about.
A good literature should explain the specific objective of your study ,in order to get the solution of the problem you must have the general and specif objective of
what your studying for.
A good literature must have an effective content: the literature its better to have a good content that enable the other people to study through your study.
A good literature review should make the good arrangement of spelling and grammar, when am talking about the arrangement it mean the author must use the punctuation in to make the reader to understand what the research targeted.
Also the good literature review should show the citation and reference, this help the readers of your work to refer the citation that you explained with in the ground of your study is true.
A literature review is a paper which include the current knowledge including substantive findings as well as theoretical contributions to aparticular topic, it always shows the signs of syntensis and understanding of a topic.
The following are the qualities of a good literature review
1. It should be wide enough to provide enough information required on the subject
2.it must identify studies and models that support a research topic
3.it must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from the reasearch topic
4. It must be conducted from reliable sources
A good literature review shows signs of synthesis and understanding of the topic. There should be strong evidence of analytical thinking shown through the connections you make between the literature being reviewed. A good literature review is NOT simply a list describing or summarizing several articles; a literature review is discursive prose which proceeds to a conclusion by reason or argument
A Literature review is the documentation of comprehensive reviews of published and unpublished work from secondary source in the ares.
The following are qualities of good literature review:
A good literature review should firstly have an effective content.
As the author of a literature review, you must become familiar with a large amount of research on that specific topic. The thesis should be clearly established.
The words used should be precisely chosen to suit the audience of the review. For instance, if the review regards to business studies and is intended for business students, the use of scientific words should be avoided.
Also, all unfamiliar words should be defined in order to boost reader to have correct interpretations.
A good literature review ought to have proper grammar, spelling and punctuation.
Since the exclamatory mark is used to indicate a strong response or command, it should be avoided. This will somewhat make the review seem unbiased since there will be no special indication of contempt.
The author should engage himself in peer reading, where his peers read the review and give ideas and suggestions, also make corrections.
The ‘spell check’ feature on computers should be utilized. This will enable the author to make corrections of misspell words in a timely and efficient manner.
A good literature review should have precise references and citations. A literature review is not a continuous series of quotes, summaries and paraphrasing from other writings but may contain small portions of all three in a precise.
A literature review is a comprehensive summary of previous research on a topic.
The qualities of a good a good literature review are as follows;
1.A good literature review must be current and up to date
2.You should be closely related to and well focused on the topic which you write and shows the research problem of your topic
3. Also you must do a comprehensive survey
4. A good literature review must use a clear language which can be easier for the one who read to understand it clearly
5.You must have a critical comparison of different approaches which point outs any methodological flaws or gaps in research
Quality of good Literature review
A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers.
1. Informative
Literature review must be rich in information about the subject, it should contain much of the study needs
2. Clarity
Literature review should include no irrelevant information about the topic researched, it should focus about the research.
3. Coherent
Literature review should clearly address the study question as well as the theoretical framework
4. Comprehensive
Literature review should be complete and including everything possible about the study that is necessary.
5. Critical
Literature review should carry critical comparison from number of studies so that to identify if there is any gap that has not yet researched.
Literature review is the writing of a comprehensive published and unpublished work from different sources of data in the interest areas.... Once the idea for a problem has been decided upon the student should then begin a literature search.
The following are the qualities of a good literature review.
1. The literature review serves several important functions.
2. It demonstrate one's knowledge of the research problem.
3. It indicates the students abilities to integrate the existing literature.
4. It gives the students the understanding of the research issues related to the research question..
5. Shows the student ability to critically evaluate relevant literature information.
A good literature review shows signs of synthesis and understanding of the topic. There should be strong evidence of analytical thinking shown through the connection make between literature being reviewed.Literature review can be define as gathering relevant information on a particular subject of the subject.
1.It should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject.
2.It must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from the research.
3.The writer must follow the stipulated formatting style.
4. The sources must be relevant and authoritative.
5.It must be clearly address the research question and theoretical framework.
6.It must identify studies and models that support the topic
7.it must lay a strong foundation for research topic.
The following are the qualities of good literature review:
1) It must strike a balance between sources supporting and opposing a particular aspect or argument.
2) It should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject.
3) The sources must be relevant and authoritative.
4) It must be identify studies and models that support your topic.
5) It must clearly address the research question and theoretical framework.
The qualities of a good literature review
1. The sources must be relevant and authoritative to simply the work
2. It must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from your research
3. It must be conducted from reliable sources by having books and journals the first priority when doing a literature review
4. It should define key term, terminology and definitions to help on understanding the research
5. It must clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework helping for having right information.
6. The writer must follow the stipulated formatting style
The quality of a good literature review are
1. should identify potential gaps in knowledge
2. Establishing a need for the current and future research project
3.A good literature review outline important research trend
- Literature review : can be defined as gathering relevant information on a particular subject of subjects.
- Literature review it include strong evidence of analytical thinking
The following are the qualities of good literature review:
●It should be wide enough to provide enough information or enough data which are required on the subject.
●It must identify studies and models that support the topic to avoid the researchers to be out of the study models. Example a student who study business administration should select the topic concerning about business administration only.
●The source of information should be relevant / clear and well understandable.
●It should explain meaning and definition of key terms, terminologies and definitions which used for easy understanding of the subject.
●It must follow specific styles or format used on research writing. To avoid unnecessary information to be written while are no longer important to be written.
What are the qualities of a good literature review
1.It must strike a balance between sources supporting and opposing a particular aspect or argument•
2.It should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject•
3.It must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from your research•
4.It must be conducted from reliable sources- students must give books and journals the first priority when doing a literature review.
5.In the event you they are using articles written by other researchers, the articles must be peer-reviewed.•
6.The writer must follow the stipulated formatting style•
7.The sources must be relevant and authoritative•
8.It should not necessarily be organized logically, organizing a literature based on the weight of points presented gives it more weight.•
9.It must clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework• It must identify studies and models that support your topic•
10. It should define key term, terminology and definitions. It should also state the meaning of acronyms.• I
The key concept of formulating a good research topic you should start with easy and simple topic.Any reasecher he/ she suppose to look for a good topic in order to make more interest to the leader. 2. A nothing is fail to know how to peak sources in the research. 3. People fail to choose a good topic which is clear and simple to do.
A literature review is a documentation of a comprehensive review of publish and unpublished work from second source of data in the area of specific of the researcher.
The following are qualities of a good literature review
1. t should bring clear and understandable information to the readers
2. It should show the strength and weakness of the research
3. It should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject
4. It must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from the research
5. It must clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework It must identify studies and models that support your topic
6. The sources must be relevant and authoritative
Literature review is critical analysis of the literature or research it is related to specific topic or the research question Or it is the published or unpublished books which wrote by
some one but it have all rules of description research.
The qualities of good literature review are the following:-
a. The basic resources it must be real and easy to conduct it.
b. The topic must heavy to support the study of research.
c. The First study of research must be widely but finally of it must be shape of funnel as to indicate what only it concerning about.
d. It must be openly and address the topic questions and the framework or review theoretical .
e. It must be easy to understand for any one who read the work done .
f. The objective of research topic must go related with environment, problems and its society that found there.
g. Must be no any bias in description of research concerning the area which research conducted .
Lliterature review is a summary of important research on a particular topic
The following are qualities of a good literature review
- Specific not generalized
- Measurable
- Attainable
- Realistic
- Formatting
A good literature review is NOT simply a list describing or summarizing several articles; a literature review is discursive prose which proceeds to a conclusion by reason or argument. A good literature review shows signs of synthesis and understanding of the topic. There should be strong evidence of analytical thinking shown through the connections you make between the literature being reviewed.
In a simple definition, A literature review can be defined as gathering relevant information on a particular subject of subject.
The following are the qualities of good literature review. Those are as follows,
• It must strike a balance between sources supporting and opposing a particular aspect or argument.
• It should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject.
• It must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from your research.
• It must be conducted from reliable sources- students must give books and journals the first priority when doing a literature review. In the event you they are using articles written by other researchers, the articles must be peer-reviewed.
• The writer must follow the stipulated formatting style.
• The sources must be relevant and authoritative.
• It should not necessarily be organized logically, organizing a literature based on the weight of points presented gives it more weight.
• It must clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework.
• It must identify studies and models that support your topic• It should define key term, terminology and definitions. It should also state the meaning of acronyms.
• It must lay a strong foundation for yourresearch topicHow to conduct a literature review.
• Scan through the abstract or introduction to check the mention of your topic.
• Evaluate the source for relevance and quality noting that a long list of sources does not necessarily translate to high quality literature review.
Name:Georgia kyaruzi
ID NO:2017110099
Question:What are the qualities of a good literature review?
A good literature review shows signs of synthesis and understanding of the topic. There should be strong evidence of analytical thinking shown through the connections you make between the literature being reviewed
Qualities of a good literature view
Exemplary literature reviews are as thorough and systematic as the research they are reviewing. Although the degree of completion of your literature review at the proposal stage is a matter of deliberation with your committee, in most cases it is important that the literature review in a proposal accomplishes the following:
it demonstrates your thorough understanding of the subject of your dissertation, through your review and analysis of previous research;
your thorough review of previous literature demonstrates gaps in knowledge of the topic, that your proposed research will address.
very importantly, your thorough and complete literature review, based on specified search criteria, demonstrates that someone has not already done your dissertation research!
According to Jackson (1980), effective literature reviews should do the following (any of these may be more or less helpful for your own purposes):
1. Define and delimit the topic. Your review should include a careful definition of your topic, and describe carefully what your topic will not include. For example, you may state that your topic includes attribution retraining, but not locus of control research, and state the reason for this.
2. Review previous reviews. What have previous reviews of the literature concluded? How will your literature review differ?
3. State procedures for obtaining relevant literature. If your review is unbiased, it should include systematic procedures for obtaining relevant literature, procedures that could be replicated by someone else who would then obtain the same literature. This demonstrates that you have attempted to find all relevant research, not just the most easily obtained research, and that you have not been deliberately selective (using only that research that reinforces your own opinion) or inadvertently selective (using certain journals because they are known to you, not realizing they only present one perspective). Search criteria can include:
computer search of relevant databases (e.g, Psycinfo, ERIC, web of science, Dissertation Abstracts) by topic (list descriptors). In my experience, I have found that computer searches reveal about ½ to 1/3 of available articles, although they are getting more thorough over the years.
hand search of relevant journals (e.g., search of specific journals that may be specifically relevant to your topic). Since most journals have only 4 issues per year, this task may not be as time consuming as it may seem!
"ancestry" search, i.e., search of references in relevant articles, chapters and books, for relevant citations
"descendant" search, i.e., search Social Science Citation Index, for relevant articles, important authors. SSCI will provide you with a list of articles that have cited these articles or authors
contact experts in the topic area for suggestions about additional references.
4. Describe common independent and dependent variables. This will show how different studies are interrelated.
5. State criteria for evaluating outcomes (this is most relevant for intervention research). If you say a particular treatment was "effective", what are your criteria for saying so? Author’s conclusion? Statistical significance? Criterion measure? Some other metric of your own?
6. Examine covariation of study outcomes with study characteristics. This is a mouthful, but it means, an educational treatment was effective (outcome), but only with elementary and not secondary students (study characteristics).
7. Support conclusions of the review with data presented in the review. Sometimes authors review an enormous amount of literature, then just conclude what their biases were in the first place! When you make specific conclusions at the end of a review, you should clearly state how and from what data sources you reached your conclusions.
Remember the gaps or limitations in the literature reviewed can directly provide your own research question!! Often, the "Discussion" section of relevant research articles provides implications for future research, which may provide ideas and justification for your own proposed research.
Conclusion
A good literature review is NOT simply a list describing or summarizing several articles; a literature review is discursive prose which proceeds to a conclusion by reason or argument. A good literature review shows signs of synthesis and understanding of the topic. There should be strong evidence of analytical thinking shown through the connections you make between the literature being reviewed.
QUESTION:
what are the qualities of a good literature riview?
Answer:
literature review is a comprehensive summary of previous research on a topic. The literature review surveys scholarly articles, books, and other sources relevant to a particular area of research.
The following are the qualities of a Good of literature riview:
1. Choose your topic; as the good researcher you should become familiar with a large amount of research on the specific topic.
2. to identify databases and resources toggle dropdown; where by it will help the researcher to know if they are on the right path on that specific research.
3. Search the literature; a good literature rivièw ought to have proper gramer, spelling and panctuation In order to be understood by the redears.
4. Read and analyze the literature; This is due to the author to have proper framer , spelling and panctuation.
5. To write the rivièw and keeping the track of information; the good literature review should have precise refences and citations.
The qualities of a good research review
1. Clarify the presentation
A good literature review enables to evaluate the quality of the research with clear criteria
2. Theoretical based
A good literature review based from an existed sources that enable the researcher to review those sources such as books, journals and other articles.
3.Well organized work
A good literature review should be presented in a logical organized
4.Relevant
A good literature review relate the research topic and the respective questions to be investigated.
5.Other findings
A good literature review should review other findings of key researcher working on, with previously topic by find out what other author agree on.
Literature review this is a cretical look on existing research that is significance to the work that your carrying out.
The following are the qualities of a good literature review.
Coherence this is very important because it help to make the research paper complete and one unit. Meaning that every part of the research paper should be well organized.
Precise this means that research paper should have completeness and it should contain detailed investigation of the research topic.
Clear this means clarity of the message, free of ambiguities this will helps reader to understand purpose of the research.
Accurate this is very important because without this research can not be valid and generalizable. Giving proper reference with a detailed information.
Controlled one of the factor of a good literature review is control to make sure that the researcher is not going out of the topic to avoid misunderstood between the reader.
A good literature review is NOT simply a list describing or summarizing several articles; a literature review is discursive prose which proceeds to a conclusion by reason or argument. A good literature review shows signs of synthesis and understanding of the topic. There should be strong evidence of analytical thinking shown through the connections you make between the literature being reviewed.
simply a literature review can be defined as gathering relevant information on a particular subject of subject.•
The following are the qualities of good literature review;
01. It must strike a balance between sources supporting and opposing a particular aspect or argument•
02.It should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject•
03. It must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from your research•
04.It must be conducted from reliable sources- students must give books and journals the first priority when doing a literature review. In the event you they are using articles written by other researchers, the articles must be peer-reviewed.•
05. The writer must follow the stipulated formatting style• The sources must be relevant and authoritative•
06.It should not necessarily be organized logically, organizing a literature based on the weight of points presented gives it more weight.•
07.It must clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework•
08.It must identify studies and models that support your topic•
09. It should define key term, terminology and definitions.
Above, are some qualities of a good literature review.
In simple terms, a literature review can be defined as gathering relevant information on a particular subject of subject.
.• It must strike a balance between sources supporting and opposing a particular aspect or argument
• It should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject
• It must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from your research
• It must be conducted from reliable sources- students must give books and journals the first priority when doing a literature review. In the event you they are using articles written by other researchers, the articles must be peer-reviewed.
• The writer must follow the stipulated formatting style
• The sources must be relevant and authoritative• It should not necessarily be organized logically, organizing a literature based on the weight of points presented gives it more weight
.• It must clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework
• It must identify studies and models that support your topic• It should define key term, terminology and definitions. It should also state the meaning of acronyms.
• It must lay a strong foundation for your research topic How to conduct a literature review
• Scan through the abstract or introduction to check the mention of your topic.
• Evaluate the source for relevance and quality noting that a long list of sources does not necessarily translate to high quality literature review.
literature review is a documentation of a comprehensive review of publish and unpublished work from second source of data in the area of specific of the researcher.
The following are qualities of a good literature review
1. t should bring clear and understandable information to the readers
2. It should show the strength and weakness of the research
3. It should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject
4. It must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from the research
5. It must clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework It must identify studies and models that support your topic
6. The sources must be relevant and authoritative.
Literature review is a documentation of a compre review of published and non published work.
in other words literature review can also be define as a gathering of relevant information on a particular subject of subject s.
The following are the qualities of agood literature review.
-completeness:
for a good literature review it should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required for aspecific subject. And it has to provide a complete informatio n from it.
-Realistic:
a good literature review has to be relevant so as it sused can relay on it on their decisions. And the sorce must be relevant and authorative .
-COnherence.
it has to have a proper and understanble conherence . It has to connect dot when read with property grammar .the writer should follow the stipulated formating style.
it should also define terms and terminology and definitions and state meanings.
Understandability:
its has to be easily understood by its user eg researchers.it has to easly identify studies, models that suport your topic.
Measurable :
A literature review compiles and evaluates the research available on a certain topic or issue that you are researching and writing about. Because lit review formats vary greatly, be sure to read your professor’s instructions first and defer to them.
To write a good scientific literature review, you have to begin with a clear understanding of the role it plays in executing a substantive piece of academic research:
- It should Clearly describe the purpose of the paper and state your objectives in completing the literature review.
- It must clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework.
- Describe the relationship of each work to the others under consideration, noting contradictory studies
- It should define key term, terminology and definitions. It should also state the meaning of acronyms.
- It must lay a strong foundation for your research topic.
- It must be conducted from reliable sources- students must give books and journals the first priority when doing a literature review. In the event you they are using articles written by other researchers, the articles must be peer-reviewed
A literature review is more than a summary of past research or an annotated bibliography. It is a work of synthesis which provides the context for your own investigations.
The followings are the qualities of a good literature review, in your literature review, you should:
- clarify your understanding of the field.
- explain the rationale for your research.
- place your research within a broader context.
- evaluate the results of previous research.
- define key concepts and ideas.
- identify research in related areas that is generalize or transferable to your topic.
- identify relevant methodological issues.
A literature review
compiles and evaluates the research available on a certain topic or issue that you are researching and writing about. Because lit review formats vary greatly, be sure to read your professor’s instructions first and defer to them;
1. It must identify studies and models that support your topic.
2. It should define key term, terminology and definitions.
3. It should also state the meaning of acronyms.
4.It must lay a strong foundation for your research topic how to conduct a literature review.
5. Scan through the abstract or introduction to check the mention of your topic.
6.Evaluate the source for relevance and quality noting that a long list of sources does not necessarily translate to high quality literature review. 📷
According to Jackson (1980), effective literature reviews should do the following (any of these may be more or less helpful for your own purposes):
1. Define and delimit the topic.
Your review should include a careful definition of your topic, and describe carefully what your topic will not include. For example, you may state that your topic includes attribution retraining, but not locus of control research, and state the reason for this.
2. Review previous reviews.
What have previous reviews of the literature concluded? How will your literature review differ?
3. State procedures for obtaining relevant literature.
If your review is unbiased, it should include systematic procedures for obtaining relevant literature, procedures that could be replicated by someone else who would then obtain the same literature.
4. Describe common independent and dependent variables.
This will show how different studies are interrelated.
5. State criteria for evaluating outcomes (this is most relevant for intervention research).
If you say a particular treatment was "effective", what are your criteria for saying so? Author’s conclusion? Statistical significance? Criterion measure? Some other metric of your own?
6. Examine covariation of study outcomes with study characteristics.
This is a mouthful, but it means, an educational treatment was effective (outcome), but only with elementary and not secondary students (study characteristics).
7. Support conclusions of the review with data presented in the review.
Sometimes authors review an enormous amount of literature, then just conclude what their biases were in the first place! When you make specific conclusions at the end of a review, you should clearly state how and from what data sources you reached your conclusions
A literature review is a search and evaluation of the available literature in your given subject or chosen topic area. It documents the state of the art with respect to the subject or topic you are writing about.
OR
A literature review can be defined as gathering relevant information on a particular subject.
QUALITY OF A LITERATURE REVIEW
• It must strike a balance between sources supporting and opposing a particular aspect or argument
• It should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject
• It must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from your research
• It must be conducted from reliable sources- students must give books and journals the first priority when doing a literature review. In the event you they are using articles written by other researchers, the articles must be peer-reviewed.
• The writer must follow the stipulated formatting style
• The sources must be relevant and authoritative
• It should not necessarily be organized logically, organizing a literature based on the weight of points presented gives it more weight.
• It must clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework
• It must identify studies and models that support your topic
• It should define key term, terminology and definitions. It should also state the meaning of acronyms.
• It must lay a strong foundation for your research topic How to conduct a literature review
• Scan through the abstract or introduction to check the mention of your topic.
• Evaluate the source for relevance and quality noting that a long list of sources does not necessarily translate to high quality literature review 📷
A good literature review shows signs of synthesis and understanding of the topic.The qualities of good literature review are
- It should be wide enough to provide enough information required on the subject
- The source must be relevant and authoritative
- It must lay a strong foundation for research topic
- It must clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework
- It must identify studies and models that support your topic
- The writer must follow the stipulated formatting style
A good literature review is Not simple a list describing or summarizing several article ,a literature review is discursive prose which proceEd to conclusion by reason or argument.A good literature review show sign of synthesis and understanding of the topic.
Qualities of a Good Literature ReviewIn
aliterature review can be defined as gathering relevant information on a particular subject of subject.•
It must strike a balance between sources supporting and opposing a particular aspect or argument• I
t should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject• It must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from your research•
It must be conducted from reliable sources- students must give books and journals the first priority when doing a literature review. I
n the event you they are using articles written by other researchers, the articles must be peer-reviewed.•
The writer must follow the stipulated formatting style•
The sources must be relevant and authoritative•
It should not necessarily be organized logically, organizing a literature based on the weight of points presented gives it more weight.•
It must clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework• It must identify studies and models that support your topic•
It should define key term, terminology and definitions.
It should also state the meaning of acronyms.•
It must lay a strong foundation for your research topic How to conduct a literature review• Scan through the abstract or introduction to check the mention of your topic.•
Evaluate the source for relevance and quality noting that a long list of sources does not necessarily translate to high quality literature review 📷
•
What are the qualities of a good literature review?
Good literature review includes:
You also refer to the following RG link on how to document the literature that you'd reviewed for later analysis & synthesis.
Research Excel Template for Literature Review Catalog
Extensiv
A broad and comprehensive survey
Current
Up to date, state of the art
Relevant
Closely related to and well focused on the topic and the research problem you are investigating
Thorough
An in-depth survey of the major contributions of significant studies to the body of knowledge under review which identifies the trends, evidence, and conclusions in the relevant literature
Critical
A critical comparison of different approaches which points out any methodological flaws or gaps in research, inconsistencies in theory and findings, and areas or issues that need further study.
The qualities of good literature review are
- It should be wide enough to provide enough information required on the subject
- The source must be relevant and authoritative
- It must lay a strong foundation for research topic
- It must clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework
- It must identify studies and models that support your topic
- The writer must follow the stipulated formatting style
A literature review is more than a summary of past research or an annotated bibliography. It is a work of synthesis which provides the context for your own investigations.
The followings are the qualities of a good literature review, in your literature review, you should:
clarify your understanding of the field.explain the rationale for your research.place your research within a broader context.evaluate the results of previous research.define key concepts and ideas.identify research in related areas that is generalize or transferable to your topic.identify relevant methodological issues.
In simple terms, literature review can be defined as gathering relevant information on a particular subject of subject
It must strike a balance between sources supporting and opposing a particular aspect or argument
It should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject
It must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from your research
It must be conducted from reliable sources- students must give books and journals the first priority when doing a literature review.
In the event they are using articles written by other researchers, the articles must be peer-reviewed
The writer must follow the stipulated formatting style
The sources must be relevant and authoritative
It should not necessarily be organized logically, organizing a literature based on
the weight of points presented gives it more weight.
It must have clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework
It must identify studies and models that support your topic
It should define key term, terminology and definitions
It should also state the meaning of acronyms.
It must lay a strong foundation for your research topic How to conduct a literature review
I guess the following link will help:
https://www.coursehero.com/file/23817052/List-10-qualities-of-a-good-literature-review/
http://iwrite.sydney.edu.au/ENGINEERING/Thesis/The-Literature-Review/Characteristics-of-a-good-review.html
This is very good question .according to my view following are the important point s while writing the review paper.
Following points are very important for writing a very good review paper
1. The title of this review paper should reflect the objective of study.
2. In the introduction- there must be a complete brief background of selected topic it should contain importance of study its relevance and applicability of results.
3. Objective it should be clear what a researcher wanted to do.
4. The review paper consists of taking the the consideration of various research paper so that when the reader read it it should get all ideas about the topic.
5. References should be clearly mention so that if anybody wants to know more about this topic he or she will easily accessible to these papers.
I think that besides offering a synthesis of the subject is to state your position towards it. It happened to me that I received comments of "how complete your literature review is, now add your argument on it". I'm not sure if this is common, but in my PhD program it is wise to dialogue with authors included in that literature review.
literature review can be defined as gathering relevant information on a particular subject of subject
It must strike a balance between sources supporting and opposing a particular aspect or argument
It should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject
It must be narrow enough to eliminate irrelevant information from your research
It must be conducted from reliable sources- students must give books and journals the first priority when doing a literature review.
In the event they are using articles written by other researchers, the articles must be peer-reviewed
The writer must follow the stipulated formatting style
The sources must be relevant and authoritative
It should not necessarily be organized logically, organizing a literature based on
the weight of points presented gives it more weight.
It must have clearly address the research question and the theoretical framework
It must identify studies and models that support your topic
It should define key term, terminology and definitions
It should also state the meaning of acronyms.
It must lay a strong foundation for your research topic How to conduct a literature review
I think the best quality of a literature review is just focusing on the core novelty aspects and investigations the made real scientific relations with bolded pivotal parts.
So, all points of views should be covered not only by scientific evidences but also with the new work's approach.
Just like most academic papers, literature reviews should contain at least three basic elements: an introduction or background information section; the body of the review containing the discussion of sources; and, finally, a conclusion and/or recommendations section to end the paper. https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/literature-reviews/
A good literature review will not only summarize the information, but also point out weaknesses in the experimental procedures as well as possible theoretical conflicts. It builds on the current knowledge by identifying gaps in the available literature and suggesting future directions for research. https://blog.efpsa.org/2011/07/20/how-to-write-a-good-literature-review-article/
A good literature review should be current and gives several possibilities for further research.
literature review can be well-defined as gathering appropriate information on a particular subject , review must be conducted from reliable sources- scholars must give books and Research journals for the first priority when doing a literature review subject
A good quality literature review specifies signs of synthesis and understanding of the Research subject. There must be strong indication of analytical thinking shown through the connections you make between the literature being reviewed. A good literature review should to have proper sentence structure, grammar, spelling and punctuation.
A literature review should cover the background of all the topics under discussion in a research.
A good literature review indicates the relevancy of the reviewed sources to the main argument, and, if appropriate, to the supporting discussion of specific points being made; moreover, a good literature review provides all of the bibliographical information necessary for other scientific researchers to be able to locate the sources, especially for those individuals who may be able to contribute in order to advance the knowledge about the issues raised.
Hi Dr Ndalahwa MUSA Masanja . See the following link: https://www.mvorganizing.org/what-are-the-qualities-of-good-literature/
Also see the following link; https://www.coursehero.com/file/23817052/List-10-qualities-of-a-good-literature-review/
Kindly see also the following link: https://mason.gmu.edu/~tscruggs/EDSE%20998%20characteristics_of_exemplary_lit.htm
I think that one of the most important qualities of a good literature review is that it should be up-to-date. Furthermore, it also should be comprehensive so that it contains all major contributions. Finally, a good literature review is the one that shows the gap(s) available in the current literature.
Background/Introduction – Give an overview of your research topic and what prompted it. Methods - Describe step by step how your performed your evaluation of the materials. Discussion/Body - The body contains the evaluation or synthesis of the materials. Discuss and compare common themes and gaps in the literature.
I think good literature review qualities is how much it matching the title and aims of paper
The qualities of a good literature review are:
1) Current importance of the review to the global research should be clearly highlighted
2) Articles selected for review must be trustworthy
3) Data abstraction and interpretation from the selected articles should be appropriate and clear
4) Structure of the article should provide an overview of a topic
5) Article should synthesize its findings into clear and valuable contribution of the topic
6) The results of the review should be reliable and usable
A good literature review should also be void of grammatical blunders and should contain most recent literatures relevant to the study's topics
A good literature review should not bias other people's ideas but help compliment and identify gaps that need to be filled in a healthy way.
ARE LITERATURE REVIEWS PUBLISHABLE?
This is a question that is asked by many young and aspiring researchers. Society has made it look like literature reviews not worth publishing and should be trashed. This article makes a case for why literature reviews should be published and why they should be encouraged.
A literature review by the way is a form of academic writing intended to demonstrate the writer's familiarity with and comprehension of the academic literature that pertains to a certain subject, which is positioned within its appropriate context. The articles that are considered to be part of the literature review may take on a wide variety of forms, and unlike empirical studies, there is no standard template or structure that you can adhere to in order to increase your chances of having your work accepted for publication. This is, therefore, one of the reasons some scholars think it is impossible to publish literature reviews. Scholars are urged to not only write research papers but also to consider writing well-written review articles in their respective fields of study. Publishing good literature reviews is evaluated and scored just like a research piece.
Even though there are some people who argue that only highly ranked intelligentsia should publish literature reviews, I stand to defer to their argument because literature reviews that are done properly by even a novice could have the potential to be published as well as count for promotions, scholarships, and other great opportunities.
A good literature review is not just a list of steps or a summary of several articles. Instead, it is a convincing argument that builds on the work of other researchers and leads to a logical conclusion. A good assessment of the relevant literature shows that one can put together pieces of information and prove knowledge about the topic at hand. The connections that are being made between the different pieces of literature that are being evaluated should show that a person is able to think critically.
A good literature review will not only summarize the facts, but it will also point out any gaps in the way the experiments were done as well as any theoretical problems that could come up. It adds to the existing body of knowledge by pointing out gaps in the previously published material and making recommendations for prospective future research directions.
WHY ARE LITERATURE REVIEWS IMPORTANT IN THE ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT AND SHOULD BE PUBLISHED?
v There is no good thesis or dissertation in any part of the world that does not contain a literature review. If any exceptions exist, it will be in very few cases. This authenticates why literature reviews are so important as a master plan that presents and validates the problems being solved and research gaps being filled by a thesis or dissertation.
v The review article offers a comparison of the articles written in the past with those written in the present.
v It acts as a roadmap for studies that may be conducted in the years to come.
v Due to the fact that review articles tend to get more citations, they have a greater chance of being accepted for publication in peer-reviewed academic journals. They do not only increase the author's citations; they also improve the journal's citations too leading to a high Journal Impact Factor(JIF). My most cited, most read, and most recommended academic article for example is a review paper. Find the link to my research articles at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael-Tiza.
v Some reviews have new ideas, like suggestions, arguments, or conclusions, that are not always in research articles.
v They are excellent reads for advanced graduate students as well as researchers who want to get familiar with starting points in a field of study.
v It points out any possible ideas that do not match up and gives a map of all the possible future research on the subject based on what has already been done, making it clear where both theoretical and empirical research is lacking.
v The literature review article could also address a specific research gap and set up a study plan for the author and other scholars who will work in the same field in the future.
v It helps people think and reason in more complex ways and gives them first-hand information about current research.
You too can publish your literature reviews today, click on the link below to get a comprehensive guide to publishing for free (NO Article Processing Charges) “Get it Published” Today.
https://selar.co/dvh7
If you are an unregistered engineering graduate in Nigeria, get the guide to becoming a COREN registered Engineer through the link below; https://selar.co/dqq3.