This question tries to delve into the obstacles encountered by Master students when writing a literature review. In other words, are the challenges purely methodological or are they related to writing deficiencies?
The challenges associated with elaborating a good literature review in writing a Master dissertation can be related to both methodology and writing deficiencies. These challenges can include issues with identifying and synthesizing relevant sources, maintaining balance between detail and brevity, avoiding plagiarism, and clearly presenting the reviewed literature in a logical and coherent manner. In some cases, these challenges may be related to gaps in knowledge or limitations in the research methods available, while in others, they may relate to issues with writing style, organization, or language proficiency. Overall, in order to produce a high-quality literature review, it is important to carefully plan, execute, and revise the review, seeking input and feedback from advisors and colleagues as needed.
thanks for taking time to answer my question. You are right, but I believe a researcher who is deficient in critical reading can not grasp content and decipher ideas correctly.