The points I'm saying are based on my education, teaching and work experience.
If, as the first important question in the world, "how can we build a better world?", One of the next questions is surely what you asked. Thank you.
The first point is that elected people must be aware of the many existing realities of society and the realities of governance before being elected. The second point is the lack of rapid and hasty changes. The third point is meritocracy. Many of the statesmen owes themselves to those who have helped them on their way to election. Therefore, immediately after they are elected, they give them important government positions. The fourth point is the preservation of national unity after the election; something that may have been damaged during the election. The fifth point is the attention of the scientific elite and the youth; along with the attention to the views of experienced politicians and retirees. The sixth point is paying attention to the position of teachers and university professors and their livelihood status. They are the unmatched capital of each country. The seventh point is paying attention to knowledge-based companies and new technologies. Eighth point attention to women and their empowerment as half the active population of society. Point ninth, attention to employment, marriage, housing for young people. The 10th point is the development of entrepreneurship and the removal of cumbersome regulations and the creation of a platform for ease of establishment and business management. The eleventh point is to engage with other countries with the principles of dignity and wisdom. Twelve Point A special look at honesty, justice and, in general, ethical behavior in society and managers and politicians. Thirteenth Point Special attention to the humanities along with other sciences. Point 14: Remember that one person always sees us. Yes ... god
Hi, Prof. @Emadoddin Ghazi. Thanks for your answer. It's brilliant to say that build a better world is the most important question. I strongly agree, because every day, when I read so much news, I have the impulse to think what should have been done to avoid the problems or what would have made the good results even better.
Hi, Prof. @Emadoddin Ghazi. I totally agree. Your words are fantastic: "The second point is the lack of rapid and hasty changes. The third point is meritocracy. " In analyzing your answer, I realized that politicians would gain a lot from being advised by academics.
Hi, Prof. @Emadoddin Ghazi. I would like to highlight that your point number nine deals with topics rarely addressed. In addition, In addition, your tenth theme addresses an issue that, unfortunately, receives the unfortunate label of neoliberalism, and which, in my view, is crucial for economic development. Thanks again.
Thanks for following the discussion. Of course, I and you know that we are not seeking to reduce government intervention and ... which are of neoliberalism characteristics. The existence of multiple restrictive laws affects the business environment. These laws actually carry out economic activities with a lot of limitations. These laws create or intensify administrative corruption. This is a fundamental issue in developing and even developed countries. Our discussion is that we can remove or modify some of the current laws for ease of business rather than adopting multiple laws. Our goal is to make the government more efficient - not to restrict it - , to facilitate entrepreneurship and economic development . This helps countries to achieve higher governance indicators (Such as WGI).
Your observation is very interesting. What is usually called neoliberalism is very broad or ambiguous, and it is preferable to speak of individual concepts rather than labels. Yes, I fully agree that the existence of a State is necessary. For example, I see in Brazil hundreds of companies that offer health plans, most of them weak. Result: high prices of services charged. In my view the solution is intervention: within a certain period, only health plans with 200 thousand lives would be allowed; within a year only plans with a million lives. There is no other way to have strong and competitive companies in such a crucial industry.
Exactly. I agree with you. It is very obvious that a start-up business or knowledge-based company can not compete like a big company. Therefore, it needs temporary government support. Our purpose is to provide this facility and initial support by the government.
Hi, Prof. @Emadoddin Ghazi. In addition to nesting new companies, especially those linked to new technologies, it is the government's responsibility to intervene intelligently in the Economy and Society. A current example: encourage cleaner energy sources.
Government is created in human affairs to rationally distribute resources, which practically means, distribution of power. The question of power is subjective to a specific society. Therefore, the qualities of good government will be subjective to that society.
A good government is one that maintains high standards of real democracy, maintains the freedom of speech, independence of the media, objectivity of information in the media, listens to the needs of citizens and meets them, takes care of a high level of employment, effectively combats poverty, efficiently resolves problems and crises economic, cares for the natural environment and the future of people, for the living conditions of future generations, cares for the good condition of the state finance system, maintains good political and economic relations with other countries, cares for high standards of providing public goods by enterprises and the efficient functioning of public institutions, wisely conducts socio-economic policy not only in the short term, but also in terms of planning and implementing long-term, long-term strategies for the socio-economic development of the country.